Search results

  1. A

    Intel Burn Test Utility

    Core damage looks interesting.. Would be nice to see a comparison..
  2. A

    It's Ordered - Thank You [H]Forum

    We need pics tbh
  3. A

    Intel Burn Test Utility

    Speaking of how far down the rabbit hole... Why even bother saying that? This isn't a "better" program in terms of what I can see you are saying, it's better for the fact that it's quicker. If I run my PC with P95 I don't leave it running for hours on end, that for me is wasting my valueable...
  4. A

    Q6600, 3.2GHz, TRUE120 checks

    Just a bit scared of lapping it! I need to locate my good philips screwdriver and have a look at the thermal paste, I'm sure it's applied to thickly, just never know how much to put on and it's hard to see from the images! Lapping is an option I've always wanted to take, Sandpaper is just...
  5. A

    Front inputs lacking quality

    I bought a new headset the other day and plugged it into my P182's front audio jacks, these are connected straight to my X-Fi Xtreme Gamer using the Intel HD Audio and my headset's mic doesn't seem to pick up very well from the front jacks but works fine in the back, it does pick up but my voice...
  6. A

    Q6600, 3.2GHz, TRUE120 checks

    I thought they were a little high if I'm honest.. They are actually around teh same as they were when I had it overclocked to 3GHz, I guess it shows how good the TRUE120 is... Still want to lap it though!
  7. A

    IntelBurnTest

    http://www.google.com/search?q=IntelBurnTest+%23&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8
  8. A

    Q6600, 3.2GHz, TRUE120 checks

    NB, SB etc are all at auto.
  9. A

    Q6600, 3.2GHz, TRUE120 checks

    Just re-overclocked my processor after getting my new RAM (Crucial Ballistix are a no go for me now, 2 pairs died without an overclock!) My setup is as follows: Q6600 G0 @ 3.2GHZ (400x8 with a 4:3 FSB:DRAM ratio resulting in a stock 1066MHz on the RAM and around 1.26 Vcore) Thermalright...
Back
Top