Search results

Hello! Your power consumption figures for Radeon 285 look wrong. In fact they are higher than the power consumption of the XFX Radeon 290 you reviewed a while back. http://www.hardocp.com/article/2014/12/10/xfx_radeon_r9_290_double_dissipation_edition_review/9#.VREsDtLLfqR

no his card was not tested to the extreme because of poor construction...he only put 1.1V on it with extreme custom cooling anyway, he doesn't test performance performance wise, GTX590 is OK construction and reliability wise, it is not...especially for an expensive highend product and if...

they did not have only one card the one used to review games died the one tested hardcore by poparamiro still works passing normal conditions do not make a product great, passing extreme conditions do

That card is still alive and kicking. He doesn't say that the card died. He analyzes the build quality,extreme thermal and OC behaviour. The OC tests were done with 2 TRUE coolers and a max of 1.1V (all written in the test). He didn't try 1.3V because of the poor construction. He didn't do an...

anyone care to answer? There are a lot of posts about GTX460 here as a general topic, but the thread is about the article on the site,and so is my question.

The power conssumption figures for Galaxy in load seem out of order in the table. Especillay as the text below doesn't say the same thing ,neither points to how big the difference is.

does anyone know if the Socket754 version supports mobile's?!