- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 2,143
Updated with I think my final stable overclocks and scores (11/10/2026).
I finally got my hands on a Core Ultra 9 285K, but it's an engineering sample. I didn't know this until I got it (I should look at the product photos better). I overclocked and optimized it, and put it against my best overclocking and optimized Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (I've gone through 5 270K Plus's). The test setup is exactly the same, the only difference is the CPU.
Core Ultra 9 285K:
P-Core = 5.7 (2) - 5.6 (6) - 5.5 (8)
E-Core = 4.8
CPU Ratio = 42
NGU = 35
D2D = 28
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus:
P-Core = 5.8 (all core)
E-Core = 5.0
CPU Ratio = 43
NGU = 31
D2D = 30
On paper, it looks like the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus should perform a lot better.
CPU-Z 3.02 Single:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 943 (+0.71%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 936.3
CPU-Z 3.02 Multi:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 19518.4 (+0.6%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 19401.5
Geekbench 7.1 Single:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 3057 (-0.1%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 3060
Geekbench 7.1 Multi:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 28739 (-1.18%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 29079


Y-Cruncher (0, 1, 8):
Core Ultra 9 285K = 166.061 (-6.88%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 155.009


Cyberpunk2077 2K High Native with an overclocked RTX 5070 Ti:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 164.24 (+1.02%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 162.57

Geekbench 7 CUDA with an overclocked RTX 5070 Ti:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 382498 (+7.19%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 355964
Geekbench 7 OpenCL with an overclocked RTX 5070 Ti:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 271430 (+2.47%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 264817
Geekbench 7 Vulkan with an overclocked RTX 5070 Ti:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 249056 (+7.11%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 231955


I may retake some of these tests and update the scores. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is obviously the better value, and all the ones I've gone through all overclock better than the sole Core Ultra 9 285K ES sample I got my hands on. Y-Cruncher also performs better with the 270K Plus. However, the Core Ultra 9 285K seems to perform a hair better in gaming at 2K High Native in Cyberpunk2077, and much more with the Geekbench 7 GPU benchmarks, which was interesting to see. The Core Ultra 9 is also much better at memory overclocking (which I'm not going to do with the price of DDR5 RAM these days).
While seemingly identical as far as specs, the 270K Plus seems to have better potential for overclocking, while also being easier to cool. On paper, the 270K Plus used here should really outperform the 285K, but it only thoroughly did so in Y-Cruncher, and barely in Geekbench7.
I finally got my hands on a Core Ultra 9 285K, but it's an engineering sample. I didn't know this until I got it (I should look at the product photos better). I overclocked and optimized it, and put it against my best overclocking and optimized Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (I've gone through 5 270K Plus's). The test setup is exactly the same, the only difference is the CPU.
Core Ultra 9 285K:
P-Core = 5.7 (2) - 5.6 (6) - 5.5 (8)
E-Core = 4.8
CPU Ratio = 42
NGU = 35
D2D = 28
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus:
P-Core = 5.8 (all core)
E-Core = 5.0
CPU Ratio = 43
NGU = 31
D2D = 30
On paper, it looks like the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus should perform a lot better.
CPU-Z 3.02 Single:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 943 (+0.71%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 936.3
CPU-Z 3.02 Multi:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 19518.4 (+0.6%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 19401.5
Geekbench 7.1 Single:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 3057 (-0.1%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 3060
Geekbench 7.1 Multi:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 28739 (-1.18%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 29079
Y-Cruncher (0, 1, 8):
Core Ultra 9 285K = 166.061 (-6.88%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 155.009
Cyberpunk2077 2K High Native with an overclocked RTX 5070 Ti:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 164.24 (+1.02%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 162.57
Geekbench 7 CUDA with an overclocked RTX 5070 Ti:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 382498 (+7.19%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 355964
Geekbench 7 OpenCL with an overclocked RTX 5070 Ti:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 271430 (+2.47%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 264817
Geekbench 7 Vulkan with an overclocked RTX 5070 Ti:
Core Ultra 9 285K = 249056 (+7.11%)
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus = 231955
I may retake some of these tests and update the scores. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is obviously the better value, and all the ones I've gone through all overclock better than the sole Core Ultra 9 285K ES sample I got my hands on. Y-Cruncher also performs better with the 270K Plus. However, the Core Ultra 9 285K seems to perform a hair better in gaming at 2K High Native in Cyberpunk2077, and much more with the Geekbench 7 GPU benchmarks, which was interesting to see. The Core Ultra 9 is also much better at memory overclocking (which I'm not going to do with the price of DDR5 RAM these days).
While seemingly identical as far as specs, the 270K Plus seems to have better potential for overclocking, while also being easier to cool. On paper, the 270K Plus used here should really outperform the 285K, but it only thoroughly did so in Y-Cruncher, and barely in Geekbench7.
Attachments
Last edited: