Zorachus
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2006
- Messages
- 12,533
Wow
a new StarCraft game was announced, a shooter in an open world
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9eQUtOQXYgQ
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9eQUtOQXYgQ
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean, if we're all being honest....Blizzard stole the entire idea of the three races from Warhammer from the get go.I like starcraft, but this looks like Temu WH40K
Won't disagree at all.I mean, if we're all being honest....Blizzard stole the entire idea of the three races from Warhammer from the get go.
I feel like they fleshed the stories out well enough over time for it to be, kinda whatever, but they definitely stole the races from 40k
It's reportedly been in development since COVID. Maybe Microsoft forced their hand.Will they ever learn? Don't announce games 5 years before release, for crying out loud! I know it says 2030, but does anyone honestly think there'll be no delays with such an ambitious title?
So they've been working on it for 6.5 years, and all they have is a pre-rendered cinematic? That's not good.It's reportedly been in development since COVID. Maybe Microsoft forced their hand.
Pretty sure it's not called StarCraft 3... OP just made a misleading thread titleOdd to make an RTS game an FPS. To be clear, and FPS set in the universe as a side game is understandable but to call it StarCraft 3 with no proper sequel is an odd move. The problem is they seem to be taking far too long and announced it far too many years in advance.
C&C Renegade did it first, and you could even use bases in it like in the RTS. But the technical limitations of the time really held that game back.Odd to make an RTS game an FPS. To be clear, an FPS set in the universe as a side game is understandable but to call it StarCraft 3 with no proper sequel is an odd move. The problem is they seem to be taking far too long and announced it far too many years in advance.
Odd to make an RTS game an FPS. To be clear, an FPS set in the universe as a side game is understandable but to call it StarCraft 3 with no proper sequel is an odd move. The problem is they seem to be taking far too long and announced it far too many years in advance.
Ja, it's just called StarCraft as I said above.Pretty sure it's not called StarCraft 3... OP just made a misleading thread title
View attachment 825836