• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

LG Display introduces new OLED deposition technique -1.6x brightness

erek

erek

8=D
2FA
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
17,787
“The process is repeated for the green and blue subpixels until the desired layout is achieved. LG says this method utilizes 64% more of the motherglass when producing laptop-sized panels, leading to less wastage, which will make displays cheaper. The company has already internally produced an OLED panel that used an entire 8.5-Gen motherglass through FLiPP, which measures at 2,200mm x 2,500mm.


LG is currently looking to apply FLiPP to its RGB OLED technology, which means self-emissive red, green, and blue subpixels will be deposited directly onto a motherglass. Otherwise, in Samsung's QD-OLED and LG's WOLED, white (or blue) LEDs pass through color filters to produce red, green, and blue, instead. Therefore, the combination of RGB OLED and FLiPP could lead to panels with exceptional color volume and gamut coverage — traditionally weaknesses of OLED.”

Source: https://www.tomshardware.com/monito...vers-1-6x-brightness-and-2-4x-longer-lifespan
 
  • Like
Reactions: Q-BZ
like this
In short: LG could offer OLED TVs (and monitors, and phone screens) that are much brighter, more color-accurate, and more affordable than they are now. OLED is already heavily commoditized, but FLiPP could make it just about as accessible as LCDs.
 
Aurelius said:
In short: LG could offer OLED TVs (and monitors, and phone screens) that are much brighter, more color-accurate, and more affordable than they are now. OLED is already heavily commoditized, but FLiPP could make it just about as accessible as LCDs.
Click to expand...

Glass is only about 5% of the cost of an OLED. They said they can utilize 64% more of the motherglass with this process, so we're only looking at about a 3% cost reduction if everything else is equal.
 
sharknice said:
Glass is only about 5% of the cost of an OLED. They said they can utilize 64% more of the motherglass with this process, so we're only looking at about a 3% cost reduction if everything else is equal.
Click to expand...
But the Motherglass having issues is why larger OLED displays are so expensive. The failure rate is atrocious. And the chemicals used to process them are the most expensive part so each is a risky indevor.

If the process lets them use more of the glass with hopefully a lower failure rate then the costs associated with each goes down substantially.
 
Laptop and monitor panels late 2027, everything else after. It's a long long wait for a better 42" oled panel.
 
zehoo said:
Laptop and monitor panels late 2027, everything else after. It's a long long wait for a better 42" oled panel.
Click to expand...
lg’s been a disappointment for me lately

woled blows imho

and watch this new tech be 1440p

i’m out if it’s 1440p
 
erek said:
lg’s been a disappointment for me lately

woled blows imho

and watch this new tech be 1440p

i’m out if it’s 1440p
Click to expand...
i’m concerned with the new technologies being 1440p

example: penta tandem oled / Alienware AW3426DW

1787603017266.png

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-com...-innovation-awards-2026-progress-amid-turmoil
 
erek said:
i’m concerned with the new technologies being 1440p
Click to expand...
I think that's more of a screen size problem. 27" monitor... or ultra wide with similar height as 27" monitor you're looking at 1440 range, bump up to 32" and there is almost no chance you're not getting 4k resolution
 
sfsuphysics said:
I think that's more of a screen size problem. 27" monitor... or ultra wide with similar height as 27" monitor you're looking at 1440 range, bump up to 32" and there is almost no chance you're not getting 4k resolution
Click to expand...
that alienware penta tandem oled is beyond 32

it’s 34-inch 1440p, so what’s the excuse now huh? 🤔
 
Whatever it is, I probably have no need for it because I can't afford to upgrade my GPU card or RAM right now, and well into the future.
 
Lakados said:
Dell actually makes remarkably good displays.
They put in the extra effort into the little things.

Use them almost exclusively at work for everyone.
Click to expand...
i’ve got the 32 inch qd-oled from dell alienware with a respectable-tolerant curve @4K 240Hz

best display i’ve ever owned
 
CrimsonKnight13 said:
I prefer curved super ultrawide instead of flat, but a good monitor is a must.
Click to expand...
I do my best to explain that “cheaper” monitors with “the same” specs as others often cost more in other issues. Getting rid of the budget Benq’s and BestBuy clearance models has cut back on so many WCB claims, and down time from eye strain, or other issues. The productivity difference is measurable, and worth the extra $$$, especially given the lifespan of the displays.

That and good keyboards and mice, accounting complained, but secretarial loved it, and even accounting came to realize the difference it made even for them. Ergonomic issues pile up and compound fast, ounce of prevention and all that.
 
erek said:
i’m concerned with the new technologies being 1440p

example: penta tandem oled / Alienware AW3426DW

View attachment 821920
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-com...-innovation-awards-2026-progress-amid-turmoil
Click to expand...
I’ve been eyeballing this for a hot minute.
I was looking at the 4K from last year (AW3225QF), but I’m not sure I could adequately push frames to that display.

1440 is the happy spot for me, good resolution, but doesn’t need a second mortgage to feed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: erek
like this
Lakados said:
I’ve been eyeballing this for a hot minute.
I was looking at the 4K from last year (AW3225QF), but I’m not sure I could adequately push frames to that display.

1440 is the happy spot for me, good resolution, but doesn’t need a second mortgage to feed.
Click to expand...
Just run dlss just about anything can run 4k now if you don't push the rt/pt
 
erek said:
that alienware penta tandem oled is beyond 32

it’s 34-inch 1440p, so what’s the excuse now huh? 🤔
Click to expand...
Bankie already said this, but why not say again. 34 inch is only beyond 32" in the horizontal direction, which gets you 3440 resolution i believe. Vertically its the same size as a 27" monitor and that's the direction of the 1440 pixel resolution.

So that 34" monitor was just a 27" monitor where the glass was cut a bit longer. Now they do make 4k 27" monitor but IMO that's overkill and a lot of them aren't far off in price from 32" monitors so why not just go bigger
 
sfsuphysics said:
Bankie already said this, but why not say again. 34 inch is only beyond 32" in the horizontal direction, which gets you 3440 resolution i believe. Vertically its the same size as a 27" monitor and that's the direction of the 1440 pixel resolution.

So that 34" monitor was just a 27" monitor where the glass was cut a bit longer. Now they do make 4k 27" monitor but IMO that's overkill and a lot of them aren't far off in price from 32" monitors so why not just go bigger
Click to expand...
ah okay

sigh

still i’m a 4K native guy, no compromises!
 
The 'problem' with 4k ultrawides is that they have 33% more pixels to push than a standard 4k monitor. And then a standard 4k monitor has 33% more pixels than a '2k' (1440p) ultrawide. So with a 4k UW you're looking at over half the performance drop of a '2k' (1440p) UW. DLSS/FSR helps but doesn't negate that sort of deficit.
 
Lakados said:
I do my best to explain that “cheaper” monitors with “the same” specs as others often cost more in other issues. Getting rid of the budget Benq’s and BestBuy clearance models has cut back on so many WCB claims, and down time from eye strain, or other issues. The productivity difference is measurable, and worth the extra $$$, especially given the lifespan of the displays.

That and good keyboards and mice, accounting complained, but secretarial loved it, and even accounting came to realize the difference it made even for them. Ergonomic issues pile up and compound fast, ounce of prevention and all that.
Click to expand...

Our IT department reports to finance and the head of IT is not going to challenge them so we get all the cheap shit. I bought my own mouse so I wouldn't have to put up with the junk they provided. I have Samsung monitors, but they're definitely not top of the line by any stretch. Had to fight to get one replaced because it kept blinking on and off. Took ages.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top