US Army Polarizes Infrared Radiation for Better Night Vision

AlphaAtlas

[H]ard|Gawd
Staff member
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
1,713
All objects emit heat in the form of infrared radiation, which is why militaries around the world use infrared cameras in night vision equipment. But one aspect that's frequently overlooked is the polarization of the radiation that objects emit. According to Dr. Kristan Gurton, an experimental physicist in the Computational and Information Sciences Directorate, "researchers have known for about 30 years that man-made objects emit thermal radiation that is partially polarized, for example, trucks, aircraft, buildings, vehicles, etc., and that natural objects like grass, soil, trees and bushes tend to emit thermal radiation that exhibits very little polarization." Researchers are exploiting this property to build infrared systems that are not only sharper, but filter out undesirable artifacts. Hoping the avoid the mistakes of overly complex past efforts, the researchers' current design uses a simple rotating polarization filter to capture multiple images that are merged into a single, filtered image. Gurton believes they'll have to move back to a "micro-pixel FPA approach" if the technology is to be commercialized. Military tech often filters down to the civilian market, so assuming they work the kinks out, I wouldn't be surprised if commercial version of these cameras shows up soon.

There are some comparison images in the original article, and you can check out a video of the tech here.

"Prior to our research at ARL, the only way to view humans at night was to use conventional thermal imaging," Gurton said. "Unfortunately, such imagery is plagued by a "ghosting" effect in which detailed facial features required for human identification are lost. However, when polarization information is included in the thermal image, i.e., a thermal polarimetric image, fine facial details emerge, which allows facial recognition algorithms to be applied."
 
Last edited:
Sweet

predator_vision_by_lol2679.jpg
 
Wonder if the polarization difference applies to non-human critters as well? Or is it just man-made objects vs natural objects that are polarized differently? Would be very interesting if humans are polarized and critters aren't.
 
I think this application is targeted more for low intensity conflict scenarios vs standard high intensity conflicts.

But yes, I definitely get you. If the hotspot is within my fighting position's range card, "between the stakes", it dies.
 
So hopefully this will help target identification and filter down somewhere around post ww3?

Better yet just train turrets to respond to particular people ... Smart drone attacks...

What a world
 
curious why people would give off slightly polarized (i.e. not randomly) light. It's all blackbody radiation, it shouldn't matter if it's biological or not.
 
curious why people would give off slightly polarized (i.e. not randomly) light. It's all blackbody radiation, it shouldn't matter if it's biological or not.

I thought the article said it was just man made objects, not people.
 
I thought the article said it was just man made objects, not people.
Gotcha, failed by the skim-read yet again.

But even so, it's not like the light is being reflected off surfaces it's being created by the object and doing so simply due to the speed of all the atoms and molecules bouncing around aka temperature. The article says "it's been known for 30 years" and this is literally the first I'm hearing of it (and I majored in physics), so I'm was just curious as to why man-made objects give off polarized light but "natural" objects don't? Which is confusing because the example images through the link show people, and while yeah technically they are "man made" it's probably closer to being classified as "natural", so again what is it about animals (or people) that makes the light polarized differently.
 
Gotcha, failed by the skim-read yet again.

But even so, it's not like the light is being reflected off surfaces it's being created by the object and doing so simply due to the speed of all the atoms and molecules bouncing around aka temperature. The article says "it's been known for 30 years" and this is literally the first I'm hearing of it (and I majored in physics), so I'm was just curious as to why man-made objects give off polarized light but "natural" objects don't? Which is confusing because the example images through the link show people, and while yeah technically they are "man made" it's probably closer to being classified as "natural", so again what is it about animals (or people) that makes the light polarized differently.

From the article. "We have been developing, with the help of the private sector, a special type of thermal camera that can record imagery that is based solely on the polarization state of the light rather than the intensity. This additional polarimetric information will allow Soldiers to see hidden objects that were previously not visible when using conventional thermal cameras." So the information of "how polarized" is somehow able to coax out some better pics? Also I find it interesting that in the video above, you can see the 'man made' lanyard quite well in the old school vision, but not the new fancy vision. Also, that they were in the 80's trying to ""Early on, researchers attempted to place micro-polarizers on individual micron-size pixels of the infrared focal-plane-array, or FPA,"" So each pixel would be individually polarized. They moved on to something more simple, but are interested in going back to a process like that to get even better results.
 
Anyone else have an induced MDMA/LSD beat in their head with that video????? Just me, eh??? DOOOH>>>DOOOH>>>DOOOH>>>WAH>>WAH>>WAH
 
I'm sure it is an early prototype, but I find my Seek Thermal Reveal Pro night vision camera provides much clearer images in some of it's alternate vision modes.

Sure it is not perfect and cannot combine modes, but pretty damn good for a little over £550.

You can see some examples of it's different modes 3/4 of the way down this page with pictures of a mug (of coffee?):
https://thermal-review.com/review/s...hermal-imaging-camera-in-depth-review-photos/

Resolution is a Key point with thermal cameras, this one has 320 x 240 pixels, but often much more expensive ones have far lower resolutions still today !

The next gen of such camera's are going to be really good I think.
 
Back
Top