Police Live Tweeting Prostitution Sting

H

HardOCP News

[H] News
Joined
Dec 31, 1969
Messages
0
Grab the popcorn, this should be interesting. :eek:

From the ads to the arrests, we'll show you how the PGPD is battling the oldest profession. Suspect photos and information will be tweeted. We're using this progressive, and what we believe unprecedented, social media tactic to warn any potential participants that this type of criminal behavior is not welcome in Prince George's County.
Click to expand...
 
lol, PG county has been going down hill for awhile as DC elements seep in but I might just have to follow this
 
Hey, good for this town that they are in good enough shape financially to have the resources to burn for nonsense.
 
we outlaw prostitution but we have a thriving multi $billion porn industry.

The amurkhun moral compass is (o⇗o)
 
mastaBlasta said:
we outlaw prostitution but we have a thriving multi $billion porn industry.

The amurkhun moral compass is (o⇗o)
Click to expand...
Its completely logical when you think about WHY prostitution is illegal in the United States.

There are more female voters than male voters, and since healthy men will pretty much take as much sex as they can handle (with random attractive strangers if anything all the better), we have an issue where:
1) Men's demand for sex exceeds the supply (this is very empowering to women)
2) Females recognize that prostitution tremendously devalues their own sexual currency, and thus will put their weight against anything that results in cheap sex on the market (reason that generally you also hear women complain more than men about "sluts" that give it out too easy)

So while they may feign being emotionally hurt by cheating and the like, with an unquestionable moral superiority, the real issue is that they feel threatened and insecure about a man no longer needing her for sexual intimacy which means her power over him is greatly diminished.

Porn on the other hand is prostitution of course, but they are only engaging male porn stars and not the male public at large. As such, its not a threat to female voters, and only the most insecure will feel that their power over their man is lost if he had a dirty mag or something so it just doesn't have enough weight behind it to be banned.

So it really isn't a double-standard at all when you think about it.
 
Sorry that was really wordy and can't edit. Cliffs notes is that women aren't stupid. They know that few people would buy a cow, if you could always get the freshest milk available hassle free and cheaply down at the corner store.
 
Ducman69 said:
Sorry that was really wordy and can't edit. Cliffs notes is that women aren't stupid. They know that few people would buy a cow, if you could always get the freshest milk available hassle free and cheaply down at the corner store.
Click to expand...

I doubt the milk would be fresh.
 
Kelby said:
I doubt the milk would be fresh.
Click to expand...
If your wife is 56 yrs old and you have $300 in your pocket, you can get the highest quality youngest fresh Russian milk on the market, which is certainly a lot fresher! Professionals are often also very good at what they do compared to unmotivated amateurs. :p
 
Ducman69 said:
Sorry that was really wordy and can't edit. Cliffs notes is that women aren't stupid. They know that few people would buy a cow, if you could always get the freshest milk available hassle free and cheaply down at the corner store.
Click to expand...

Cliffs of cliffs: women are cows?

*runs and hides*:D
 
tylerflorence.jpg
 
Ducman69 said:
If your wife is 56 yrs old and you have $300 in your pocket, you can get the highest quality youngest fresh Russian milk on the market, which is certainly a lot fresher! Professionals are often also very good at what they do compared to unmotivated amateurs. :p
Click to expand...

Hypothetically, if my wife is 56, I must be in the same range or older. Need to factor in the price of a Viagra. +$20. :D
 
Ducman69 said:
Its completely logical when you think about WHY prostitution is illegal in the United States.

There are more female voters than male voters, and since healthy men will pretty much take as much sex as they can handle (with random attractive strangers if anything all the better), we have an issue where:
1) Men's demand for sex exceeds the supply (this is very empowering to women)
2) Females recognize that prostitution tremendously devalues their own sexual currency, and thus will put their weight against anything that results in cheap sex on the market (reason that generally you also hear women complain more than men about "sluts" that give it out too easy)

So while they may feign being emotionally hurt by cheating and the like, with an unquestionable moral superiority, the real issue is that they feel threatened and insecure about a man no longer needing her for sexual intimacy which means her power over him is greatly diminished.

Porn on the other hand is prostitution of course, but they are only engaging male porn stars and not the male public at large. As such, its not a threat to female voters, and only the most insecure will feel that their power over their man is lost if he had a dirty mag or something so it just doesn't have enough weight behind it to be banned.

So it really isn't a double-standard at all when you think about it.
Click to expand...

Theoretically, couldn't someone just say they are filming the encounter for resale or even personal use and loop hole the law then?
There must be more of a difference between pron and prostitution.
 
And massive privacy lawsuits begin in 3...2...1...

I have a feeling PGPD is gonna pay out the ass for this one.
 
Carouselambra said:
Theoretically, couldn't someone just say they are filming the encounter for resale or even personal use and loop hole the law then?
There must be more of a difference between pron and prostitution.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure you actually have to register as a business and what not, so a hassle and taxes I'm sure are involved and what not.

Personally, I think they shouldn't ask "what if" and just look at places in Europe it was legalized. It was illegal, they made it legal, and they pretty much ended human trafficing and girl abuse and abusive pimps overnight. Girls were off the street out of public view in designated areas (no more jumping fences in the night by appartment complexes and BJs in cars in the back of buildings or sleezy motels), had security in a fixed establishment with cameras, and even if there were minor issues such as non-payment because it was a legal business they had police protection. I had read they had also reduced the STD concern, as it became regulated with inspections and regular health checks and what not.
 
PG county is the most corrupt cesspool of maggots.

I can't speak to the prostitutes though.
 
First, why wouldn't you LIVE STREAM it? :rolleyes:

Second ... Bad Girls Bad Girls, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they cum on you ... :eek::cool:
 
Ducman69 said:
Its completely logical when you think about WHY prostitution is illegal in the United States.

There are more female voters than male voters, and since healthy men will pretty much take as much sex as they can handle (with random attractive strangers if anything all the better), we have an issue where:
1) Men's demand for sex exceeds the supply (this is very empowering to women)
2) Females recognize that prostitution tremendously devalues their own sexual currency, and thus will put their weight against anything that results in cheap sex on the market (reason that generally you also hear women complain more than men about "sluts" that give it out too easy)

So while they may feign being emotionally hurt by cheating and the like, with an unquestionable moral superiority, the real issue is that they feel threatened and insecure about a man no longer needing her for sexual intimacy which means her power over him is greatly diminished.

Porn on the other hand is prostitution of course, but they are only engaging male porn stars and not the male public at large. As such, its not a threat to female voters, and only the most insecure will feel that their power over their man is lost if he had a dirty mag or something so it just doesn't have enough weight behind it to be banned.

So it really isn't a double-standard at all when you think about it.
Click to expand...

So much this... it's the oldest profession in the world for a reason. Past civilizations realized it wasn't going to way and had accepted areas of society for stuff like this. It's just sex afterall, just because some people have a stick up their ass about its morality doesn't mean the rest of the world does. I'm rather embarrassed that our country (US) has such a backwards and pathetic view of sex.

My personal experience with women as a 32 year old single "successful" male. (i.e. job/house/car/paid bills/good credit) is that even without prostitution... women are generally not worth my time (at least the ones I meet) There are loads and loads of women that will use the term dating when they really just mean sugar daddy. I'm sorry but no matter how hot you are, it's not worth 500 dollars, a free trip to the clinic, AND a free entry into your baby daddy of the month club. If they don't go that route, they will do the total opposite and want you to practically be married and a step-daddy to their existing children before they will slob the knob. To hell with both types.


For a government so money hungry and tax-happy, they have left one of the biggest money pits in the world untapped. Just to make a bunch of frigid bible beaters happy.

Sometimes it's fun to imagine old civilizations thousands of years ago who had open and free societies in this manner... the fun and happiness that only comes from a good ole' orgy.
 
There must be more of a difference between pron and prostitution.
Click to expand...

Yea, I think there is a difference. In Porn neither "actor" is doing the paying, the producer is, as in business. But you might have one hell of an angle there.

Nothing says how much you have to pay an actor, minimum wage comes readily to mind. I am not going to go any farther down this line of reasoning but I am pretty sure there is a legal loophole here that can be exploited.
 
TechLarry said:
And massive privacy lawsuits begin in 3...2...1...

I have a feeling PGPD is gonna pay out the ass for this one.
Click to expand...

Blotter reports are public access. They are usually available daily, mug shots and all. They are just providing the info a bit faster.
 
Carouselambra said:
Is it just me or does anyone else think law enforcement stay off social media?
Click to expand...
Yeah, social media hasn't quite worked in favor of police officers.

Look at the fiasco with the NYPD when they asked Twitter visitors to post pictures of themselves with the NYPD. What did NYC citizens do? They tweeted pictures of NYPD officers in bad situations-- beating up suspects and other sights of NYPD police brutality or excessive use of force, or people and protesters getting arrested.
 
Kelby said:
Well said. Could they be doing this to openly warn the off duty cops? :cool:
Click to expand...

In Oakland they'd have to warn the on duty cops. We had a news outlet film a police lieutenant "checking for disturbances" for 40 minutes at a time, twice per shift, at a brothel.
 
They plan to share "suspect photos" on the internet? That's really, really low and perhaps borderline illegal.

Also, prostitution should be100% legal. Where I live only pimping is strictly forbidden.
 
dgz said:
They plan to share "suspect photos" on the internet? That's really, really low and perhaps borderline illegal.

Also, prostitution should be100% legal. Where I live only pimping is strictly forbidden.
Click to expand...

The cops do things that are illegal all the time. Big surprise. Prosecutors will not do anything out of conflict of interest, and few people have the deep pockets or desire to be endlessly fucked with necessary to fight the cops.
 
Porn is taxed, prostitution isn't. Since prostitution isn't taxed the government doesn't get their cut, therefore it is illegal. I'm sure there are other reasons, but I'm betting this is a big reason.
 
that and the presumed moral authority of people who killed hundreds of millions of people in the 20th century alone.
 
prostitution - pay someone to have sex with you
porn - pay someone to have sex with someone else

both can be filmed
both can be put on the internet
both can take place on white leather couches
both can make you feel better.
 
xX326Xx said:
Porn is taxed, prostitution isn't. Since prostitution isn't taxed the government doesn't get their cut, therefore it is illegal. I'm sure there are other reasons, but I'm betting this is a big reason.
Click to expand...

How long did you spend thinking up that gem? 2 seconds? Half a second?

Why aren't massages illegal, genius?
 
I think prostitution, just like drugs, was made illegal for purely economical reasons. Who controls both? Well, the government, silly. Only not directly. Plenty of money without taxes and official accountability. Amazing!
 
Ducman69 said:
2) Females recognize that prostitution tremendously devalues their own sexual currency, and thus will put their weight against anything that results in cheap sex on the market (reason that generally you also hear women complain more than men about "sluts" that give it out too easy)
Click to expand...

collegeboy69us said:
My personal experience with women as a 32 year old single "successful" male. (i.e. job/house/car/paid bills/good credit) is that even without prostitution... women are generally not worth my time (at least the ones I meet) There are loads and loads of women that will use the term dating when they really just mean sugar daddy. I'm sorry but no matter how hot you are, it's not worth 500 dollars, a free trip to the clinic, AND a free entry into your baby daddy of the month club. If they don't go that route, they will do the total opposite and want you to practically be married and a step-daddy to their existing children before they will slob the knob. To hell with both types.
Click to expand...

I have no idea where anyone gets the idea that gamers are misogynistic.

dgz said:
I think prostitution, just like drugs, was made illegal for purely economical reasons. Who controls both? Well, the government, silly. Only not directly. Plenty of money without taxes and official accountability. Amazing!
Click to expand...

I'd say it goes back to our Puritanical roots. Christianity and other western religions run deep in our culture. Don't agree with it, but there it is. And that actually doesn't even make sense; drugs and prostitution, being made illegal, means government is cut out of the revenue stream. If it was made legal, that would be for economic reasons.
 
Umm, a good portion of prostitution is involved with human trafficking and coersion by illicit means.

If you guys look on the surface to just see both are the same when in reality one is done, oftentimes, unwillingly for survival (whether they face abusive Johns or to not be killed or to feed themselves) and one does it to "glamorize" themselves with spunk covered faces, you're terribly wrong.

In the same context, do some of you think slavery picking cotton is the same as a volunteer environmental cleanup person? Neither are paid, you can film both, and both are involved in physically laborous tasks our in the blazing sun either on a highway or field. :rolleyes:
 
Ducman69 said:
Its completely logical when you think about WHY prostitution is illegal in the United States.

There are more female voters than male voters, and since healthy men will pretty much take as much sex as they can handle (with random attractive strangers if anything all the better), we have an issue where:
1) Men's demand for sex exceeds the supply (this is very empowering to women)
2) Females recognize that prostitution tremendously devalues their own sexual currency, and thus will put their weight against anything that results in cheap sex on the market (reason that generally you also hear women complain more than men about "sluts" that give it out too easy)

So while they may feign being emotionally hurt by cheating and the like, with an unquestionable moral superiority, the real issue is that they feel threatened and insecure about a man no longer needing her for sexual intimacy which means her power over him is greatly diminished.

Porn on the other hand is prostitution of course, but they are only engaging male porn stars and not the male public at large. As such, its not a threat to female voters, and only the most insecure will feel that their power over their man is lost if he had a dirty mag or something so it just doesn't have enough weight behind it to be banned.

So it really isn't a double-standard at all when you think about it.
Click to expand...


^^^ forever alone
 
Cube said:
Porn dont spread aids and STDs.
Click to expand...

Yes it does actually -- only very rarely even in the span of the last 30 years. Google it - there were a few good series on this topic on NatGeo or one of the BBC channels a long time ago.

Fact of the matter is with testing alone there is a much reduced change of anything being spread around. If something does happen it's quick to be caught and contained. Same sort of situation would apply in (legal) prostitution. Testing involved to limit any risks.

Either way -- it would be a damn sight safer than the system we have now. (none) and the oh so terrible crime of a man being horny would be taken care of.
 
Addition to my earlier since I can't edit:

the consequence \of testing and having an HIV scare was that the entire industry in the US shut down for a period of time, like dead in it's tracks. In the series I saw, patient zero was some guy who was doing porn in south america and banged a tranny, came back to the US and started doing straight porn. I could care less the dude banged a tranny, i care that they did it without doing tests.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top