Battlefield vs. Call of Duty Ghosts

Which did you find more enjoyable?

  • Call of Duty: Ghosts

    Votes: 19 17.0%

  • Battlefield 4

    Votes: 93 83.0%
  • Total voters
    112
I've been on Ghosts last night (been playing Payday 2 mostly), I'm shocked to see only 2.3k people playing it with most lobbies being hacked... Wow, IW need to get their s**t together...
 
Neither. Both games are just shells of what they use to be.

You should have added a third option to that poll.
 
that question was "which was more enjoyable" i doesnt ask how much you enjoyed it but for me COD Ghost was far superior for me.
 
Sometimes I get in the mood to play a larger map with vehicles and do some damage with team-work on BF4. Other days, I just feel like running and gunning by myself on Ghosts.
 
Both franchises were good for one, probably two iterations if we count expansions.
 
If Battlefield could make the single player option like in BF2(battle the bots), that would rock. I really enjoyed it.

Otherwise single player was very short on both. So neither.
 
Single player or MP?

Single player is a wash to me.

Multiplayer, I'll take BF any day of the week. The teamwork, the destruction, vehicles. I just don't get that kind of satisfaction with CoD anymore.
 
Surprisingly I liked COD GHOST SP was little short though. Also liked the high res textures and DX11 implantation and animation don't believe any BS about this game looking bad people clearly haven't played in all its glory TBH liked i though it looked better than BF4


BF4 campaign was boring and graphics are bad just a bunch of lighting/post processing trickery hiding muddy textures. Yes i played on max settings with 2 780s 10-120/fps

MP both suck COD is the same thing over and over again.
BF4 netcode is a joke and ruins everything being competitive FPS player its pretty frustrating trying to work around this.
 
Last edited:
pcalltheway2 said:
Surprisingly I liked COD GHOST SP was little short though. Also liked the high res textures and DX11 implantation and animation don't believe any BS about this game looking bad people clearly haven't played in all its glory TBH liked i though it looked better than BF4
Click to expand...

Friends of mine had played it and said it looked crap.
Went round and their monitor brightness was way too high.
Now they think Ghosts looks great, doh!
 
Ghosts looks nice on a IPS monitor =)

Finally got to spend some points only level 14....got a decent scope for my assault rifle it helps a ton!
 
Right now. Niether. I'd never pick CoD: Ghosts. Maybe head back to CoD:MW1 or 2. Stick with BF3 or BFBC2. But neither of the two in the poll.
 
Both are bad. BF4 should've been a DLC to BF3 rather than a stand-alone game and the optimization is a heck of a cluster fuck.

Ghosts Mp is just pure shit. Oh wait when was the last good MP game IW released since COD4? Hmmm
 
Matthew Kane said:
How is Ghosts on PS4?
Click to expand...

I'm mainly a PC guy, but I believe that CoD after MW1 has always been first and foremost a console game.. it is also the first time I've played CoD on a console. I'm enjoying it as there is a lot of people to play against unlike PC versions of CoD after CoD4.

I think the game looks not bad, I mean its no PC max settings good, but hell it looks a lot better than the Xbox One version by a mile, haha.
 
Is it true you can't play audio format files through the PS4? I read an article they cut off MP3 and such. So more gaming oriented.
 
I didn't vote but, if I absolutely had to, I would vote for Ghosts because I didn't buy it. It gave me less pain than BF4.

I think BF4 sucks compared to 2&3. It's pretty but, that's about all I can say good for it.
 
It should've been a DLC or some expansion pack for little $$. Turned out to be a clusterfuck of a game with very little new features (some quite annoying).
 
Single player or multiplayer.

I prefer CoD for it's SP because at least they try and sometimes pull it off rather well (Ghosts was pretty good actually).

I prefer the BF multiplayer when its working for being more involved, making you more cautious, and not being so random (perks are the worst idea in the world imho).
 
In reality, both of these games are atrocious from a competitive standpoint. As far as pub games go, BF4 should tickle your gooch as long as you are willing to look past some ridiculous bugs.
 
Why neither? Do you like Coke or Pepsi? "Neither, I don't drink soda"... then ignore the poll, you're not the target audience. Lady Gaga or Katy Perry? I don't listen to it, so I won't answer.... :rolleyes:

I prefer the game play of Battlefield much more than CoD, so BF4 is my choice. CoD was great in a few (original, CoD2, MW).
 
Ur_Mom said:
Why neither? Do you like Coke or Pepsi? "Neither, I don't drink soda"... then ignore the poll, you're not the target audience. Lady Gaga or Katy Perry? I don't listen to it, so I won't answer.... :rolleyes:

I prefer the game play of Battlefield much more than CoD, so BF4 is my choice. CoD was great in a few (original, CoD2, MW).
Click to expand...

That is easy, Katy Perry!

What about a "both" answer in there too?! :p
 
You should add battle field 2142 to the poll, the best (and last) game in the series.
 
I tried playing Ghosts as I've always found COD single player to be fun. Perhaps it's just my system but it was so terrible choppy that I just ended up un-installing it. The studder was unbearable. I've been having fun with BF4 multiplayer the past few weeks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top