SkribbelKat
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 5,330
I thought Steve Ballmer was/is older and stuff. *ponders*
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dont think he tries to hide that lol.True... well that clearly means that Steve hates Apple!
Well in fairness if Apple did come out with an iTV it would hopefully be Retina level (4k) to help push out the new standard.
Apple hasn't tried anything new since the iPhone.
iPad?
I don't think we've seen a totally new game changer from apple since 2010.
Makes you wonder if they've been working on something big recently.
@rudy
One thing you are forgetting is the experience that Apple gives over all. Yea its generally not the best anywhere but they give you something that works and is a good experience. They give you an eco system that can apply to everything as long as you have the Apple framework (iTunes). They literally integrate everything you could want for entertainment and make it so mind numbingly easy to do everyone wants it. That is what gives them the ability to charge so much.
But generally yes I agree, to get most of this on other competing products usually involves little to no experience and just some googling.
Yes, the Apple experience is definitely unique. Just make sure you properly bend over before unpacking your new iGroan.
I'm not exactly sure why the Apple experience has been able to carry over for so long with such a huge price tag. I know people are paying for it but I can't exactly figure out why people are STILL paying that price when there are better alternatives out there and for cheaper.
I just recently picked up a few old school android phones for personal media players for $15-$20 a peice at work last week. They are replacing my old cheap MP3 players and they still work great!
I'm not exactly sure why the Apple experience has been able to carry over for so long with such a huge price tag. I know people are paying for it but I can't exactly figure out why people are STILL paying that price when there are better alternatives out there and for cheaper.
I believe the term you are looking for is "Stockholm Syndrome".
I think that many people overestimate the price of Apple products. One can buy cheaper products, but are they really as good as Apple products? There are many products in the Windows space that are far more expensive. Almost no one in the Apple ecosystem buys $500+ GPUs and no one pays $1000+ for a tablet.
Apple hardware isn't cheap but it is generally far from top line dollars as well.
Most of their business happens at extreme mobile section where Windows segment isn't anymore expensive then Apple is.
Apple stock prices thread with a discussion about Windows 8. heatlesssun must be here.
Insane trolling, SkribbelKat and his kitty p0rn must be here.
pot meet kettle
Well that's the thing, better for whom? Us? Them? The competitors? Apple has consistently delivered a seamless, high performing, and trouble-free experience with its devices. No other company has that track record. That's not to say its perfect, which Apple fanboys will argue for, but it's pretty damn good.I'm not exactly sure why the Apple experience has been able to carry over for so long with such a huge price tag. I know people are paying for it but I can't exactly figure out why people are STILL paying that price when there are better alternatives out there and for cheaper.
But now you're carrying around a second device in addition to your phone.I just recently picked up a few old school android phones for personal media players for $15-$20 a peice at work last week. They are replacing my old cheap MP3 players and they still work great!
I agree. I'd never buy an Apple laptop or desktop, I think the MacOS sucks, but some people like it and Apple is actually more price competitive now. Look at some of the Ultrabooks out there compared to a Macbook Air.I think that many people overestimate the price of Apple products. One can buy cheaper products, but are they really as good as Apple products? There are many products in the Windows space that are far more expensive. Almost no one in the Apple ecosystem buys $500+ GPUs and no one pays $1000+ for a tablet.
Apple hardware isn't cheap but it is generally far from top line dollars as well.
Well that's the thing, better for whom? Us? Them? The competitors? Apple has consistently delivered a seamless, high performing, and trouble-free experience with its devices. No other company has that track record. That's not to say its perfect, which Apple fanboys will argue for, but it's pretty damn good.
I think there's a lot more to it than just marketing. The iPhone is a premium phone and always has been. Same with Macbooks, iPads, etc. The U.S. has a lot more money to throw around than almost any other country in the world, AND it's one of the largest countries in the world. Apple markets here because it knows it can sell here. A developing country, not so much. The other thing to consider is this is that the U.S. is Apple's country of origin. Obligatory car analogy: Mercedes-Benz vehicles are rarer here in the U.S. than they are in Germany; that doesn't mean they're any less of an awesome premium vehicle.I'd attribute its popularity more on the marketing. In a country where Apple isn't plastered all over the TV and phones are sold at stores where they're placed side by side with competing models instead of a single phone on a pedestal, iPhones are a rarity.
Well that's the thing, better for whom? Us? Them? The competitors? Apple has consistently delivered a seamless, high performing, and trouble-free experience with its devices. No other company has that track record. That's not to say its perfect, which Apple fanboys will argue for, but it's pretty damn good.
For example, look at their phones: they consistently have fast or even the fastest hardware that's also pretty damn nice looking, top tier screens, a consistent but full-featured OS, a proven app store, proven music service (iTunes), and fantastic support, just to name a few things. That and they were the first company to really push an entire platform like that. Google is finally catching up and at a much cheaper price, and that's why they're gaining market share, but they still have to compete against Apple's legacy (i.e. people who won't switch because Apple has always worked well for them).
This kind of tin foil hat arrogance is why people don't take many tech geeks seriously. Watch your real world get demolished below:Hardly. Please stop taking Jobstacy(TM) and come back to the real world. I've been asked to fix other people's iDevices so many times it isn't funny.
Wait, so you dislike Apple because iCloud didn't work seamlessly, despite your inept attempts to circumvent the official and proper ways to backup and restore devices (iCloud, iCloud Backup, iTunes Backup). This kind of obnoxious hipster blaming I see all the time from supposed "geeks" and it ruins our credit within the real world. "I'm too cool to use the corporate official methods, but I'm still going to blame them when I can't figure it out myself."Two recent examples come to mind :
1.In one case, I was helping a friend transfer her data and settings from her iPhone 4 to her new iPhone 5. The settings and stuff on the iPhone 4 were backed up to the magic cloud and then the iPhone 5 was told to restore the data from the backup on her magic cloud. Each and every time, the restore failed with a mysterious "Could not restore backup message" that told me absolutely nothing about what the error was.
Because Apple refuses to support industry standard methods of accessing data on their phones (such as USB MS) and because I do not use Windows or Mac OS X on my primary computer and, because, even if I did, I would never install the iTunes bloatware, the "cloud" was the only option available to me for backing up and restoring data (the iPhone 5 had not, at the time (being brand new), been reversed engineered to work with the FOSS tools).
As you can imagine, having to backup and restore several gigabytes of data over an internet connection and then having to do that multiple times is very time consuming. Had this been an Android device, I would have simply rooted it and pulled up LogCat to view a detailed log of whatever error was impeding the backups. But this is the iPhone and, in Apple's ultimate quest to make the user as helpless as possible, there is no way to get these devices to give you a useful error.
After over an hour and a half of messing around with the device, I finally figured out that a third party program (one vetted and approved by Apple, no less, in their "app store") was causing the issue. Which one, I do not know because I simply told it not to back up third party apps (as I hadn't the time to manually toggle on and off dozens of different apps and wait for the backup/restore).
When I first got my 3GS in late 2009, iTunes wouldn't load music on it properly. It turns out with the next update as long as I didn't screw around and try to disable services, everything worked fine. About two weeks ago I couldn't FaceTime my lady friend because Apple's network was down. Neither of us cried about it. These are regular occurrences with any technology. This very forum is riddled with troubleshooting inquiries, most much more prevalent, and more important unfixable, than anything you've offered about Apple. I find it very hypocritical that people hold Apple up to some perfect standard just so they can knock it down if it slightly misses it.2.In another example, I had a coworker ask me to take a look at her personal iPad. She was unable to update it to the latest iOS. iTunes would download the iOS update and then, at the very end, give a mysterious and completely unhelpful error message about how the "network connection had timed out" (keep in mind that this was after the download had completed). A Google search revealed many other people having this problem but no solutions for this problem. iTunes was uninstalled and reinstalled. Windows was reinstalled. Multiple internet connections were tried. After spending hours trying to fix this problem, I finally just found a location to manually download the iOS update and manually put it in the appropriate folder on the hard drive.
Wait, so Apple designs an OS that complements its hardware and that makes you upset? Maybe you should read some reviews that shows how the steep competition stacks up: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6440/google-nexus-4-review . Apple comes out on top as the slimest, fastest device, with the best battery life. Is it difficult/impossible to root? Sure. Do I care? Not one bit. Same with the other 99.99% of the population. Having an Android phone that can overclock is neat. However I'm not 15 anymore and I need a phone that's reliable and offers the best hardware. That's the iPhone 5 right now. The point is there's too many of these ridiculous and illogical arguments that come off as "I hate Apple just because they're sometimes better."CPU wise, a Cortex A15 is faster than the A6X. It's also not a fair comparison; iOS is the functional equivalent of DOS, and, like DOS, requires a less powerful processor to run. Android, on the other hand, is far more flexible, far more functional, and allows for true multitasking. This of course, uses more CPU power.
This kind of tin foil hat arrogance is why people don't take many tech geeks seriously. Watch your real world get demolished below:
Wait, so you dislike Apple because iCloud didn't work seamlessly, despite your inept attempts to circumvent the official and proper ways to backup and restore devices (iCloud, iCloud Backup, iTunes Backup). This kind of obnoxious hipster blaming I see all the time from supposed "geeks" and it ruins our credit within the real world. "I'm too cool to use the corporate official methods, but I'm still going to blame them when I can't figure it out myself."
When I first turned on my iPhone 5, had all my contacts immediately thanks to iCloud, before I even looked into backing up my 3GS.
I was surprised and pleased. My co-workers with iPhone 5's (physicians and student physicians; app support for the medical community is great on the iPhone, but that's another story) had similar experiences.
Right now, I can't access my Gmail at this moment because of a 502 error. This is the third or so time this has happened to me in the last 5 years, but by your definition that means Google is a shitty company and no one should buy their products. Get real. Technology is wonderful and many companies put out awesome products, but not everything is 100% compatible 100% of the time.
When I first got my 3GS in late 2009, iTunes wouldn't load music on it properly. It turns out with the next update as long as I didn't screw around and try to disable services, everything worked fine. About two weeks ago I couldn't FaceTime my lady friend because Apple's network was down. Neither of us cried about it. These are regular occurrences with any technology. This very forum is riddled with troubleshooting inquiries, most much more prevalent, and more important unfixable, than anything you've offered about Apple. I find it very hypocritical that people hold Apple up to some perfect standard just so they can knock it down if it slightly misses it.
Wait, so Apple designs an OS that complements its hardware and that makes you upset?
Maybe you should read some reviews that shows how the steep competition stacks up: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6440/google-nexus-4-review . Apple comes out on top as the slimest, fastest device, with the best battery life. Is it difficult/impossible to root? Sure. Do I care? Not one bit. Same with the other 99.99% of the population. Having an Android phone that can overclock is neat. However I'm not 15 anymore and I need a phone that's reliable and offers the best hardware. That's the iPhone 5 right now. The point is there's too many of these ridiculous and illogical arguments that come off as "I hate Apple just because they're sometimes better."
But you only tried one way to make it work, and furthermore found that it was a 3rd party app the threw a wrench in the process. Personally I'd rather have a more open app market that allows more apps that may or may not "just work." You fail to see the hypocrisy in complaining that Apple offers a closed OS, but then also complain when it branches out to more apps. It seems like you're just here to complain.My "inept" attempts to circumvent the official and proper ways to backup and restore devices only happened after the official way (Blessed by His Holiness, Steve Jobs, Lord High Saint of Cupertino, of course) failed to "just work" (tm).
So you think, but you don't know for sure, do you? It might be that there's a bunch of inefficiencies/performance losses in doing so that Apple does not want to take on. I'd like to load up my iPhone and just move my music over into a folder on it, that would be nice. However, for the ~3-4 times a year I update my music collection and then my iPhone, it's not a terrible bother, so it's not worth complaining about to me.What is inept (or sinister, depending on your point of view) is the fact that iOS does not support industry standard methods for accessing data. Requiring the user to use proprietary software in order to retrieve their data is unethical; it would take no effort for Apple to support USB Mass Storage or *standard* MTP.
And it mostly does, especially within their official software and their official systems, and more importantly raised the bar for the competition. Apple has shown that QA matters, but I'm not so naive or spiteful to assume that they have 100% perfect QA, and I'm not personally insulted when something doesn't work. You found a glitch, be a responsible consumer and go report it to the manufacturer. We do it here all the time for nvidia, AMD, intel, OCZ, Samsung, etc. etc.The point is that, in my case, it didn't do this.
The point is again, that, in my case, it didn't do this.
Google doesn't claim that everything "just works".
Apple is the one who created the standard by stating that everything "just works".
Speaking of a straw man, limited in functionality how? It makes phone calls, texts, browses the web, has email, a music player/storage, acts as a hotspot/tether, plays games, runs 100,000's apps for all other kinds of uses. Where is this limitation you think everyone is missing so (which they aren't). If you want to extend it to desktop usage, sure, there's more I can do on my PC than on a Mac and that's why I own one, but it seems like you're only talking about iOS.Nice straw man. No, Apple designs an OS that is so limited in functionality that a 486 could run it fast.
I mean, using Apple's logic, everyone should replace Windows with FreeDOS. After all, it is almost certain that there are some programs that FreeDOS could run faster because there aren't a bunch of other programs running in the background.
Wow, for someone who seems to dislike straw men you sure make a lot of them. Apple's phones on average sell for $600+. That is a very high cost for many people. Android phones sell for much less and there are many more of them. You're arguing why does Toyota outsell Mercedes-Benz and I'm trying not to laugh at you.If this is true, then why is Android outselling iOS?
The Nexus 4 is also not a Cortex A15.
Insane trolling, SkribbelKat and his kitty p0rn must be here.
though I think from watching you post in the past, you tend to be unable to keep track of who upset you with what thing and when.
Yes, you should know by now that to him, all the world outside of himself is a single entity. One person has a problem, and suddenly it's "people" have a problem, a group of people are arguing and some how that is equal to him single handedly holding an argument by himself.
So true.
So anyhow, did Apple's stock recover yet? Does that really matter? Huge swings are kinda just an indication of crazy investors trying to make a few extra $$ in trading and sometimes don't have a lot to do with the company.
But you only tried one way to make it work, and furthermore found that it was a 3rd party app the threw a wrench in the process. Personally I'd rather have a more open app market that allows more apps that may or may not "just work." You fail to see the hypocrisy in complaining that Apple offers a closed OS, but then also complain when it branches out to more apps. It seems like you're just here to complain.
So you think, but you don't know for sure, do you? It might be that there's a bunch of inefficiencies/performance losses in doing so that Apple does not want to take on. I'd like to load up my iPhone and just move my music over into a folder on it, that would be nice. However, for the ~3-4 times a year I update my music collection and then my iPhone, it's not a terrible bother, so it's not worth complaining about to me.
Speaking of a straw man, limited in functionality how? It makes phone calls, texts, browses the web, has email, a music player/storage, acts as a hotspot/tether, plays games, runs 100,000's apps for all other kinds of uses. Where is this limitation you think everyone is missing so (which they aren't). If you want to extend it to desktop usage, sure, there's more I can do on my PC than on a Mac and that's why I own one, but it seems like you're only talking about iOS.
Wow, for someone who seems to dislike straw men you sure make a lot of them. Apple's phones on average sell for $600+. That is a very high cost for many people. Android phones sell for much less and there are many more of them. You're arguing why does Toyota outsell Mercedes-Benz and I'm trying not to laugh at you.
In both of our MacBook Pro with Retina Display reviews (13-inch & 15-inch), I pointed out a big downside to the user experience today: UI performance in some applications is significantly reduced compared to non-Retina models. I couldn't find a direct cause for the issue, just that whatever work Apple does to make OS X look like OS X ends up requiring quite a bit of CPU power, and the workload scales with resolution. I've seen this in applications like Mail and Safari, although it's present in more than just that.