dioxholster
Gawd
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- Messages
- 801
Google is sounding like a cool place.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's currently acceptable to discriminate against fat people and smokers.
Land of the free, home of the brave.
The united states government can deny you employment based on number of children and certain agencies can deny you service if you are not married.
Military can deny you employment if you have to many children, Air Force will not let unmarried pilots fly certain aircraft.
And I'm pretty sure you can be barred from military service still if you say you're gay.
Being fat should not be a protected right, period. If you want to be fat sure I don't care, as long as it does not hinder others.
Being gay doesn't come into factor with medical insurance or how often you might be sick.
Intentionally stuffing your fucking face because you lack will or are too lazy to exercise should garner you no special protections.
Go to the fucking gym.
Zarathustra[H];1037426401 said:Its undeniably established that being overweight is an unhealthy condition that leads to all kinds of illnesses, like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and some studies are even showing links to Alzheimers now.
That doesn't mean that all thin people are healthy, but it does mean that all overweight people are unhealthy.
This is not an opinion. It is pure unadulterated fact. Absolute irrefutable truth.
Code:Male Height to Weight Ratio Height Low Target High 5' 1" 123 134 145 5' 2" 125 137 148 5' 3" 127 139 151 5' 4" 129 142 155 5' 5" 131 145 159 5' 6" 133 148 163 5" 7" 135 151 167 5' 8" 137 154 171 5' 9" 139 157 175 5' 10" 141 160 179 5' 11" 144 164 183 6' 0" 147 167 187 6' 1" 150 171 192 6' 2" 153 175 197 6' 3" 157 179 202 Female Height to Weight Ratio Height Low Target High 4' 10" 100 115 131 4' 11" 101 117 134 5' 0" 103 120 137 5' 1" 105 122 140 5' 2" 108 125 144 5' 3" 111 128 148 5' 4" 114 133 152 5' 5" 117 136 156 5' 6" 120 140 160 5' 7" 123 143 164 5 '8" 126 146 167 5' 9" 129 150 170 5' 10"132 153 173 5' 11" 135 156 176 6' 0" 138 159 179
If you are outside of the above ranges (in Lb) your body weight is unhealthy, unless you are a body builder or something (and its actually debatable whether or not body building is a healthy sport)
You can get a handcap tag for your car if you are overweight. So they already consider it a handicap
According to this scale (looks like the retarded BMI scale) I am morbidly, morbidly obese, despite being fairly skinny.
Calories in = calories out is actually bullshit.
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/gary-taubes-goo.html
Yes, I know thats not a reputable website, just read the book and ignore whatever the website is telling you now.
Zarathustra[H];1037425158 said:This^
3.) If someone is undisciplined in taking care of their own body, it is not a stretch to assume that they might be undisciplined in tending to their work.
I wouldn't hire a slovenly person ether.
Lol, no kidding. At 6"4, wide framed, put me under 230 and I'll look unhealthily skinny.
Oh, and that damn chart up there...
It says I'm supposed to weigh 179??? At 6'3"???? WTF?? I'm 202 right now, and if I got down to 193 I'd look like crap...SKINNY!! I can't imagine where I'd lose and additional 14lbs!!
BUT, for my wife, she's 5'5", it says 136...bingo. Perfect.
Something is wrong there.
Lol, no kidding. At 6"4, wide framed, put me under 230 and I'll look unhealthily skinny.
I agree, some are wasted, and some are used in other body functions. But I believe a book written and based on scientific fact. If you take in more calories than you are going to expend, or your body is capable of wasting, that is turned into fat for storage to be used at a later time if needed. This isn't a new fact, and it also isn't only restricted to humans, many animals do this as well.
As I mentioned, fast foods are made with things either humans have not evolved to digest, or are very hard to digest. These things are very bad for you to eat, yet the ability to get a full meal in under 10 minutes usually isn't a bad thing, I cannot deny. Some people just go overboard and eat crap ALL the time, and don't exercise. Walking to the fridge from the sofa and back again doesn't count either.
Even if you are overweight now, and don't have health problems, who's to say you won't in the future? You certainly have a higher chance than someone who is within the height/weight standard. Also, over time fat its self can turn in to all kinds of nasty stuff if it just sits there and is never burned or anything. The point is basically this, you can eat whatever the hell you want, I do most of the time. But I also jog nearly every day, and workout every day. Sometimes I splurge and pig out on fast food, or pizza, or whatever else, but I'm not in harms way due to the fact I actually take care of myself.
Another thing is yes, you are viewed differently by some people, potentially a future employer. Sometimes when future employers see overweight people they will pass them up on the job just because of a future hike on their insurance for what could be future problems with the person. Why not just be fit and save yourself the potential future problems, or current problems. It's easier to eat a healthier diet than to exercise as well, hell, when you go to fast good places get one of the healthy meal options (even though some of them aren't healthy either), easier than exercising maybe if you don't have the willpower to drag your ass to the gym or around the neighborhood on a walk/jog. /rant
Who cares, fat people mean higher insurance rates and more health problems which means missing work etc.
I'm sorry but I don't think it's terribly wrong to discriminate against someone who consciously puts themselves into poor health.
Just like how unhealthily skinny all the NBA players under 6"4 at 230 or less look? Come on.
Counter point would be the 300 pound lineman in the NFL who is 6'8" or the this 400 lbs behemoth.. Just looking at weight without any other measurements is definitely not the way to judge health.
What makes you think either of them are terribly healthy?
Imagine all the gas passing from their fat asses in the elevator.imagine the fat girls looking at each other awkwardly in the elevator wondering why they got rejected lol
I'm with him, these whore ARE gifted , damn their sexy looks!whore are lucky enough to be genetically gifted.
My retarded Asian doctor does who works for Kaiser... says I'm overweight... ok fine I got a bit of a belly... says when he first saw me some years back I weighed 155 pounds @ 5'11" and I was healthy then... most recently however when I mentioned being 130 pounds after high school (same height too) he said I probably was the most healthiest at that time...No one and I mean no one uses height weight charts any more lol that was the garbage they told you in middle school in the late 80's lol.
Counter point would be the 300 pound lineman in the NFL who is 6'8" or the this 400 lbs behemoth.. Just looking at weight without any other measurements is definitely not the way to judge health.
but the point is 230 is no where near the minimum healthy weight for someone 6'4. Many athletes I see at that height are around the 200 pound mark.. In fact, unless youre packing on alot of pure muscle, you're going to be somewhat chunky at that weight and height.
what?? 230 is not too light for someone 6'4
In fact, unless youre packing on alot of pure muscle, you're going to be somewhat chunky at that weight and height.
funny story - sounds like a stunt to make it seem like she wasn't hired for a reason other than being unqualified.
on a side note - i wonder how many people in here are ranting and raving about great health, exercise, etc while sitting on their ass eating a bag of chips in front of the computer. finally an audience who can't tell what you look like...right?
I agreed with everything you said until I read this. Light lifting is just a little better than using a Shake Weight. Lift heavy. Your muscles will not get stronger or retain mass on a deficit unless it's facing heavy stimulus on a regular basis. Read: you won't get "toned" or "lean" or muscular unless you're lifting heavy. You don't need to go balls to the wall, puke your guts out after every lifting session. You don't even need to go to failure, but you need to always lift heavier or more to combat your muscle's capability to adapt.
I think everything else in your post is the truth and exactly what 50% of the people in this country need to hear, but please don't tell people to do "light" weight lifting, unless it's just your method of getting them over their fear of weight lifting.