Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually the 2600K has a better IGP than the 2600. It's just that the P67 chipset boards (which allow overcloking the processor) don't support IGP. H67 supports IGP and IGP overclocking, but not processor overclocking. It's really wacky what they've done.
So, it's either faster processing (P67) or integrated graphics (H67).....take your pick. It seems like Intel is playing games with its customers. I assume that since the graphics is integrated with the processor that overclocking the cpu would also overclock the gpu....and the gpu can't handle the overclocking. Am I right?
If I understand the situation correctly, I don't believe that the "k" models have IGP. The 2500 and 2600 (without the k) have IGP. That's probably what you meant anyway.
sorry but i have to disagree with what i had bolded with supporting linksNot so.
All i5s (including the Ks) include the IGP; however , no i7s include the IGP (which is why no i7-K + H67).
The P67 supports both i5 and i7 (non-K and K); however, the H67 only supports i5s.
Other diffs:
1. i5s are all quad-cores and include the IGP, but none (including the 2500K) support HT.
2. No i7 supports integrated graphics (therefore, i7+H67=non-starter); however, the i7-2600K supports HT.3. Discrete graphics and H67: Discrete graphics is not roadblocked in any way/shape/form by H67 any more than it was by previous Intel IGPs; if anything, it's roadblocked even less. For the first time, multi-GPU technology and Intel IGP are not just in the same sentence, but on the same motherboard - the ASUS P8H67 EVO supports QuadCrossFireX or SLI, and is mATX to boot.
i7 2600K HD Graphics 3000 benchmarks: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/...core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/11
(dead horse beaten to 2D)