Recent content by Tyler Troglen

It ended up actually being more like 248 watts. Just goes to show how wrong software can be "We tried to use identical settings to the tester (mining drivers were used): 1000MHz core at 1000mV, 1100MHz Memory, and -25 Power Limit. We were easily able to get the 43.5 mHash/s rate that the tester...

Why would they need a 512bit bus? 1080 ti on a 352 bit bus has the same memory bandwidth as the vega 64

I switched to an insider build a couple months ago to try this out. Guess they finally released it, now it's time to go back to non insider builds http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4457/~/preview-of-4k-uhd-netflix-content-on-nvidia-gpus

No its 4x8. My heatsink blocks ram slot 1 so i can't use 2 of the sticks atm. Yeah i was very worried that the ram wouldn't work at higher speeds because it wasn't even listed on the QVL. I've had 0 issues with the ram so far. Actually the only issue ive had so far was related to my case (...

I did a test with Handbrake, it seems to slow the timing down by about 20%. Handbrake showed 7m 36s but the actual time was 9m 6s. It was spot on after a reboot

I'll look and see if it has that option (haven't looked yet)

I have, it is for sure the Sleep bug. I guess the question i need to ask is, if its not really running that speed why does every single benchmark show higher scores? Tested Handbrake and Deus Ex also, both show an increase. Can any benchmark truly be trusted

Asrock x370 Taichi (Beta bios 1.55) RYZEN 1700X Cosair Vengence LED blue 3000Mhz CMU32GX4M2C3000C15B Runnning at 2933Mhz 16-17-17-35-69 1T @1.35

I recently got my 1700X build completed. I have overclocked it to 4Ghz but in windows it is running much higher according to task manager and benchmarks. While running benchmarks task manager shows a speed of 4.6-4.68Ghz. Benchmarks reflect that speed also. anyone else seeing anything similar...