Recent content by trackersoft

Hi Sunjar, Volume 1 is for LTO5 drives. Are you sure you need volume 1? your drive is LTO4 I have volume 1, let me know if you really need it.

To me it sounds like you are observing some kind of silent data corruption - perhaps raid controller cache or another component, related to raid controller. This is why always should be in use consistency check mechanism (e.g. like in ZFS/BTRFS).

I use HP Ultrium 3000 external SAS2 drive. It is LTO-5 and it is first generation which supports LTFS. I use Windows 7 x64 and drive is recognized with normal drive letter. Everything works fine, data copy is done via exporer/copy/paste :) Of course backed up data is not changed often, so you...

Hi RSQ :) One question here: where exactly you bought the drives from? can you give me the links? I am interested in buying such tape drives. Thanks!

Yes please! :) We want more!

I have E8400 with Asus MB from 2008 (G43+ICH10R) and it works without any issues with 10TB Seagate's. Your PC is much newer, it should work without problem.

Hello Ken, let me try to answer on some of your questions: Will Windows 7 x64 see this without issue after this? - No, windows 7 needs additional driver in order to support NVMe It's been a long time since I've cloned an OS but does this process make the new drive active, can boot from? - No...

Hello, i had similar issue few years ago. My problem was that integrated ICH10R controller was corrupting the data. I've disabled it from BIOS and installed external HBA adapter.

your thread is about memory problems, not data storage, so...my comments are about data storage, not your memory problems.

I think you are trying to f*cking with me, huh?:mad:

Anyway, what I wanted to share is that in the presence of such large amounts of data it is reasonable to consider using some method for detecting and maybe recovering silent corruptions. because I had exactly this problem and I found it a little bit late, the thing is that I can no longer count...

it is your data...not mine :cool:

yeah...12GB ram for desktop, ot 24GB...or 10TB hdd for desktop...do you have ever think what will be if you lose your 10TB data ? :D

so guys, do you thing it is good idea to have so much ram (not ECC) and also not reliable hardware (intel ICH) without any kind of checksuming against silent data corruptions?

hello, i have similar problems with my PC. http://forums.storagereview.com/index.php/topic/27704-ich10r-raid5-silent-data-corruption/page__p__256873__fromsearch__1#entry256873 i haven't resolve my problem, i just use the other SATA controller on my mobo (jmicron 36x).