Recent content by Tisca

Here's a LinusTechTips vid where they tested 4k and popular games with a R9 285. http://youtu.be/j4xDfEOGONw (new since 13h ago)

I'd love to see a photo of this for size comparison. EDIT: or just do this http://www.displaywars.com/24-inch-16x10-vs-32-inch-16x9

So "full bandwidth" is 2560 x 1600 and the longer 3m< passive cables work for lesser resolutions? Looks like I'm going with one 3m DP and my old 2m DVI. Should be enough since the case is closer to one of the monitors... and don't have much other choice portwise. Thx for the help!

That's one of the questions. For the resolution and refresh rate it doesn't matter. Guess I'm looking for an excuse to not buy old tech like DVI. I'm also under the impression that DP-DP cables are slimmer and bend more easily. Is this the case? Wouldn't mind that.

I have two 290s in Crossfire, each have DVI, DVI, DP, HDMI. I'm running through the DVIs currently but I need longer cables so I thought I could go with DP cables. Monitors have DVI and DP inputs. (1200*1600 @60Hz) If I use DP for one of the monitors, what for the second? I'm assuming you...

AMDs coming will be numbered from the low hundreds, like R9-290 and they will be announced Sept 25th. <-educated speculation

Not a 800D, that's for sure. The window might be home made so don't take that into consideration while searching.

Too bad they continued with the same design as the U2412M (as others in the series) but had to increase the bezel thickness. It's like making ugly uglier. How big a power save are we talking about here? If the old model can be had for significantly cheaper I'd probably go for that.

I'm guessing it will be cheaper than what the 3011 was new with the AH-IPS panel. If that's the case it should be a lot cheaper or have better features for me to choose it over the much better looking 3011.

Nvidia's Titan to be named "Geforce Titan" or "Geforce GTX Titan" http://www.sweclockers.com/nyhet/16487-nvidia-geforce-titan-ar-geforce-titan (Swedish)

You end up believing what you want to believe. If it's too good to be true... it probably is.

Clearly fake. Why would you cover up the name unless it wasn't a "titan" or they didn't know what it's name is going to be so they couldn't 'shop in another model. From OCN: Looks like it said 690.

http://www.sweclockers.com/nyhet/16459-intel-databas-avslojar-ivy-bridge-e-med-upp-till-15-karnor (Swedish) Google transl.

"First half of '13". Let's wait for Cebit in March, if no news probably Computex in June. It's always later than sooner but with AMD's results lately you'd think they put something out ASAP.

Well the 680 I consider to be a 670Ti rebranded while the GK110 should've been the real 680 so a "680 Ti" would be a 670Ti² =).