Recent content by the_killer

damn, i'm sorry I made a big mistake it's not a compressed file, it's a iso file (winrar is associated with it so it fooled me) so compressed size = uncompressed size its symantec 10 iso file even tought, i go from one iso file to 1785 files and it's faster in software raid0, i'll try...

well decompressing the file from one disk to other took 1m30s these drives have both of them normal partition (the ones i now tested) and raid0 partitions in raid 0 it still takes about 43s so it's really a lot faster! anyway, one of the non raid partition is in the beginning of the...

i don't feel a lot of cpu usage by using software raid, but it should be higher than any other solution of course (it's a pentium d 805) "How long does it take to extract from one drive to the other one? Raid 0 for extracting archives is usually a waste, because one could reduce the number...

what do you guys think of this http://www.overclockers.com/articles1297/index03.asp i also have little experience with raid. i have raid 0 with software raid(yes, windows xp raid! only with some hard drive space) with 2 120gb ide 2mb cache drives extracting a 300mbytes iso takes 1m14s...

i use windows raid0, with 2 ide seagate barracuda 7200.7 120gb i have 62mbits writing speed and 42mbits reading speed according to atto

well, the ibm drive is old and no up to current drives so yes but the adaptec 29160 is good either sell it (i looking for one.. or something like it) or buy a newer hardrive for it, get something that is u320

i have2 ibm 18350n win raid0 in hdtach i have 50mbs from the beginning to the end and 50mbs burst speed i also have 2xide seagate 120gb 7200rpm in software raid0 and this raid is faster that ibm drive is old and slow it was launched in year 2000+- at that time it was quick, but now...