• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Recent content by the

  1. T

    pix vpn

    I have a vpn set up in a client server config between two locations on pix devices, mainly because there are remote vpn user's that vpn in to the main pix as well. I've now been instructed to set up a standard lan to lan vpn between the two sites, with the explanation that the main site...
  2. T

    1 wan interfaces on 1841

    (psst, i just grabbed an 1841 with two ethernet interfaces and a 4 port swithc card. it works like charm)
  3. T

    1 wan interfaces on 1841

    aw shucks i lerv you too <3 *snuggles*
  4. T

    1 wan interfaces on 1841

    yo fewl gotta small wireless project going in, and since interntet is so sketchy out in the boondox of desert heaven there was a desicion made to pruchase dsl and cable internet with the idea of wan fail over. woo hoo! two internets! The original idea was to have something like a watchgaurd...
  5. T

    test a point to point t1 in house

    sweet, worked perfectly. thanks a ton.
  6. T

    test a point to point t1 in house

    Hey guys, i got two routers, and want to test a point to point t1 here in house. never done the in house test before, but for some reason i seem to remember it being possible, and that i just make a flip over cable. anyone know the details of this procedure? google isn't helping me :<...
  7. T

    ACL question

    allright SWEET veedubs ftw final and working is this interface FastEthernet0/1.5 description Production encapsulation dot1Q 6 ip address 192.168.50.1 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 101 in ip access-group 101 out access-list 101 deny tcp host 192.168.50.22 any eq www...
  8. T

    ACL question

    i dont know, do i? all i want is to allow full access to everything (like it is right now) and block one host from the web. that's it. in 2 or 3 weeks when i do some real reading i'll set up soem acl's worht a darn to compliment our firewall, right now i just have a request to deny http...
  9. T

    ACL question

    well mabei dont have it figured out. in my tet it seemed to work, i could do everything but surf, i just applied it to the pc i wanted it on, and he can do nothing. no access to files shares or anything, however he can ping his subnet. what am i missing? code is as follows interface...
  10. T

    ACL question

    ok i got it, using out instead of in seemed to work, i'll have to look up the differneces in a bit. thanks for all the halp guys. luv u bunches <3
  11. T

    ACL question

    well that didn;t work either, i ran your lines boscoh only to deny all traffic what so ever to the specific address i put it on, except on its subnet (i could communicate with hosts on its subnet, but not wiht hosts on other vlans, or the intenet on any protocol). so im thinking the last line...
  12. T

    ACL question

    that's funny, i apply to rules to see my entier subnet get blocked, and jsut come back from the server room removing that rule and see your post boscoh. good times. round 2 FITE.
  13. T

    ACL question

    thanks for hte reply, as it sits i dont have any access lists at all, so i assume i want this to be an extended one? (100 or greater?) and then apply it to the vlan that that specific ip is on?
  14. T

    ACL question

    hey guys, Im getting ready to put up a full ACL here at our company, and am looking at doing this over the next coupla weeks, however, i just had a manager request i deny all web access to a computer that his subordinates are taking advantage of. as far as i know this will be the only PC in...
  15. T

    point to point t1's

    the point to point is already decided upon, it'll be 487 a month for one connection, and 485 for the second (both from a qwest var, the run;s would be strictly qwest, so no need for public ip) the current t1 is 399 a month. there is no reliable cable/dsl solution at either remote location...
See more
Back
Top