It would actually be very easy to fix on a forum. User is required to be logged in and the first person tho actually click view is marked as the one that took it. If a second user actually received it they could have the option of saying they took it.
Alright I will setup a job that does this just for testing. Are you running reverse or forward incrementals? since it seems either way you have to go through almost all of them depending on forward/reverse incremental backup method.
Do you think I will get better performance via NFS Vs...
I could use reverse incrementals I have been bitten too many times by backup exec breaking incremental to trust it I know veeam is a different product But at what point do you change from incremental to full. Once a year.
Veeam has compression in dedup friendly mode. I actually am doing more Full datasets then incrementals the only actual incrementals is my 6 weeks worth but everything else will be full backups.
Age of Data Granularity Amount
14 Days 12 Hours 3x Full then 28x Incremental
6 Weeks 1 Week 2x...
So question the way I understand it is that zfs using iscsi mounted on a windows host there is no real use for a zil since all iscsi traffic routes around the zil.
Now I have no real reason for using iscsi vs nfs unless there is some specialty reason. Right now I have a single host connecting...
I mean to say that the ZIL needs a super cap that can flush the writes from the local ssd cache to the internal memory before failure but this is not a requirement for the l2arc since its a read only medium and all information is also store on the disks.