Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
This is not exactly what you said as we can see here:
And this is just not the case as 4Kn (advanced 4Kn format) can only work with ashift=12 as they don't have emulation for 512bytes as opposed to the 512e (advanced format drives) which have 4K physical sectors, report 512b logical sectors...
Well that's a pretty good answer to my question :) Very much appreciated Gea for laying it down that way!
I was seeing things the same, I guess I just wanted another confirmation that ZFS would utilize 4k in 512e drives ;)
Thank you!
Why would a 4k native drive be a lower performance? I am just wondering, there are 8 times less operations involved in finding a sector. And there is less overhead from gaps between sectors. That generally means that heads are much faster in acquiring these sectors. Given that how would you...
I understand the differences between different raid setups with ZFS and I've been using ZFS for many years already. I am also aware of the replacement limitations in vdevs created with ashift=9.
The real questions here are:
1) Is there any difference between 512e and 4kn from ZFS point of view...
Guys, I will try to keep it very short as I tend to get into unnecessary details.
My ultimate goal is to choose between using 512n, 512e, or pure 4kN drives for a new ZFS storage appliance that will either consist of eight 4TB drives in four mirror VDEVs, or eventually Raidz2 in order to...