If I was the guy who decided to put the FX moniker on the Bulldozer CPUs I wouldn't feel very safe about my job right now.
Seriously seeing the benchmarks of these FX chips was a slap in the face for most of us, who anticipated the return of this legendary model name.
@Zarathustra[H]
Regarding Civ 5. I think I know why Civ 5 doesn't do well on more cores even though it's a well threaded app/game.
It uses Python as its scripting language. Python has this thing called GIL (Global Interpreter Lock) which in certain cases can cause penalties when adding...
I am in a bit of a different boat, since I run OS X. So motherboard choice for me is mostly based on compatibility. So I upgraded now. Will wait and see when Apple starts supporting IB/2011 boards.
1440x900 is a laptop resolution, so I think he may be talking about laptops. I would go Llano on a laptop, it's a good deal. For desktop I agree with you.
This shows nothing we didn't know. When benchmarked in GPU limited scenarios stock speeds, fx-8150 scores close to 2500k.
Nobody buys a 2500k and runs it at stock. Fact is 2500k has about 200Mhz more clock potential over BD. Clock for clock BD gets destroyed by 2500k even at multithreaded...