Recent content by rrtw

I wonder why there's no EDIT function for the posts ?

As far as supporting the AGEIA PhysX in games the support is on par with the demand meaning that since there is less to no demand for PhysX cards there is less to no demand to develop games that support the AGEIA PhysX engine.

[RCKY] Thor wrote: Actually u can buy a Core 2 Quad for as low as 528 $ http://www.pricegrabber.com/p__Intel_Core_2_Quad_Q6600_Processor,__31693422 Actual web sources are relating that at the launch of AMD Barcelona Quad Core, Intel will cut prices of Quad cores at about 266$ in Q3 of this...

To [RCKY] Thor man you don't get it physics is just about processing power or GFlops. If we look at the AGEIA PhysX they say it has 22 GFlops instructions/second and 58 GFlops sphere colisions per second. Now wether you look at it as a 22 GFlops or 58 GFlops PPU it's still small compared to a...

With dual and quad core CPUs more than enough to process physics in games + new DX10 cards from NVIDIA and ATI that incorporates physics acceleration in their GPUs who the fuck needs another 150-200$ card like AGEIA PhysX for physics acceleration ? Like their name is saying AGEIA is AGING...