I see AMD selling the 5600G around the 200 mark and may be reducing the 5600x to 250. I still think we will see a 5600XT on more mature 7nm which will be around 300 as it will compete with the 8 core 11700.
the 3600 is pretty old news now and merely exists as surplus it's a year and a half...
As he says, if you are prepared to give up a lot of performance but get enough to game okay for a while then the 11400 is okay, the 3600 at stock was still competitive even though it is very old by now standard. If you can't wait for AMD new releases then it is okay
the 11500/400 may only be interesting in that they are cheap build parts, designed for H of B chipsets and decent entry level gaming systems with lower end graphics cards.
the 5600x at 65w and it can work well on a mid level B550 or B450 board makes it a better part if power is a factor...
lol you posted benches against older Zen processors. games like CSGO, F1 have every Zen part roflstomping the 11900k. Intel does not beat AMD by 30-40 frames at all at best a 1-3FPS range though it's slower on average as well as hotter than the sun.
if he stays with Intel he should wait it...
a perfect Intel launch, hype and false claims for 2 months with the internet bombarded by clickbait. on review day it is almost like rocket lake doesn't exist.
the 11600k is kind of at the FX8350 treatment of buy if you want cheap, though some places have a 5600x for around 300 dollars which...
the 5600x at 65watts was murdering the 11600k at +125watts in almost everything. the 11600k is just nice because it is a budget gamer build. if the 5600x drops to 300 dollars it's over
Something is odd about that as the 11700K is about 5600, the all core boost is not that much higher to get 6800. That is probably a fixed max overclock score.