You do realize ALL lcd's in the world have polarizer layers right? The reason you have not heard anything about them is because the best polarizer is one that doesn't affect viewing angles, and virtually all monitors/tvs/display that use LCD technology have the exact same type of polarizing...
At the end of the day sample-and-hold tech is still terrible for motion, regardless of refresh rate. I would urge anyone who thinks their 240+ hz LCD feels smooth, to go try a 60hz plasma for 30 seconds. Literally any plasma. Its amazing how much a difference pulsed displays make in perceived...
Brightness is a non issue for OLED, at least for 99% of users. The contrast makes HDR looks 100x more impactful than even a 2000-nit LCD. WRGB is also not an issue for anything, including text. They also WILL be much different from the CX/C1. The early comparisons of the new panel vs the old...
I just dont see how these 32" LCD's are going to compete against the 42" next gen OLED. They will be the same price, yet the OLED will destroy them in every way except in burn-in risk. It will be easy to overlook the size increase from 32", and if you really wanted you can 1:1 pixel map to a...
The reason for this is the way Sony prioritizes features. First and foremost they care about accurate image processing. Samsung and LG have vastly different approaches to video science than Sony. Sony will always dedicate the grunt of their processing power to pure image quality.
Forget these crappy 32" LCD's, Sony just announced their 42" A90K. Now the real party has started. These are using LG's new much brighter panels as well, and early rumors say they are even less susceptible to burnin as prior gen panels.
Hes not over complicating, if hes following the steps on blurbusters and its failing, the monitor is frame skipping. Even an old iPhone in slowmo setting can detect frame skipping.