Recent content by nvidia_amd

  1. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    To be fair, the switch on the m32u is super thin and easy to miss. Its highly unusual on a monitor as well.
  2. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    You do realize ALL lcd's in the world have polarizer layers right? The reason you have not heard anything about them is because the best polarizer is one that doesn't affect viewing angles, and virtually all monitors/tvs/display that use LCD technology have the exact same type of polarizing...
  3. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    Yea cant do a 27" monitor, which is what that is but in 21:9 aspect.
  4. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    Ill be getting the 42C2 from bestbuy with a geeksquad warranty, as it covers burn in.
  5. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    Heres your display port you so badly wanted: https://www.anandtech.com/show/17172/ces-2022-asus-announce-rog-swift-oled-pg48uq-pg42uq-gaming-monitors
  6. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    At the end of the day sample-and-hold tech is still terrible for motion, regardless of refresh rate. I would urge anyone who thinks their 240+ hz LCD feels smooth, to go try a 60hz plasma for 30 seconds. Literally any plasma. Its amazing how much a difference pulsed displays make in perceived...
  7. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    Brightness is a non issue for OLED, at least for 99% of users. The contrast makes HDR looks 100x more impactful than even a 2000-nit LCD. WRGB is also not an issue for anything, including text. They also WILL be much different from the CX/C1. The early comparisons of the new panel vs the old...
  8. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    I just dont see how these 32" LCD's are going to compete against the 42" next gen OLED. They will be the same price, yet the OLED will destroy them in every way except in burn-in risk. It will be easy to overlook the size increase from 32", and if you really wanted you can 1:1 pixel map to a...
  9. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    The reason for this is the way Sony prioritizes features. First and foremost they care about accurate image processing. Samsung and LG have vastly different approaches to video science than Sony. Sony will always dedicate the grunt of their processing power to pure image quality.
  10. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    Forget these crappy 32" LCD's, Sony just announced their 42" A90K. Now the real party has started. These are using LG's new much brighter panels as well, and early rumors say they are even less susceptible to burnin as prior gen panels.
  11. N

    The 32 inch 4k IPS 144hz's...(Update - this party is started) (wait for it...)

    All the M32U's I had were silent, all the way up to 144hz.
  12. N

    LG 32GP850-B 165 hz monitor frame skipping like crazy even at 120 hz

    Hes not over complicating, if hes following the steps on blurbusters and its failing, the monitor is frame skipping. Even an old iPhone in slowmo setting can detect frame skipping.
  13. N

    Samsung - The Terrace, question

    Pixels will be more noticeable, however they are both 8.3 megapixel displays. The amount of detail will be the same at 43" or 120".
  14. N

    Samsung - The Terrace, question

    Are you outside? At nearly 2000 nits in SDR mode, its going to be painful to look at in normal lighting conditions, let alone the dark.
Back
Top