Recent content by neomoz

Does anyone know if this display will accept 4k 120hz 10bit 4:4:4 over hdmi 2.1?

The reason I bring it up is I saw this on their spec sheet. "HDMI2.1 supports PS5 and XBOX series X/S at 4K UHD@120Hz (4:2:0)" That would lead me to believe it's not even 40Gbps. We know PS5 caps out at 32Gbps and XSX is 40Gbps, so I'm worried it's a gimped hdmi 2.1 implementation.

When someone grabs one of these displays, could you confirm it can do 4k 120hz 10bit 4:4:4 over hdmi2.1, the specs on their website do not tell us anything whether it supports the full 48GBbit/s spec.

PG43UQ is only 90% P3 color space, so it's not quantum dot and looks to be using the same AUO panel the prior 43" version did. I'm hopeful the Aorus panel is using a newer Samsung panel, so hopefully the response times are better.

They all flicker when they're trying to refresh below 50hz. The best way around it to try and set the floor of the VRR range to be > 60hz to avoid flickering and let LFC handle it.

It's IPS, which has a poor native contrast ratio, even with lots of zones you're never going to control the bloom when trying to push 1000+nits, the light bleeds in surrounding pixels because IPS cannot block the light well enough. This is why most HDR tvs are VA panels and even those panels...

I own the 650F and there is no coil whine here, monitor for all intent purposes is completely silent. Have you tried plugging the monitor into a different power point? Usually coil whine is related to the power source/supply. I live in a new 5 year old home so all my wiring is new, I remember...

Well the game is running sub 60fps, so that's why you don't feel any of the benefits of the higher refresh rate. You need to either turn down some settings to get the FPS in the ~100fps range or try other games which can hit higher FPS much easily, stuff like overwatch etc. 144hz is very...

Those early NAVI benchmarks show AMD has improved their rendering efficiency to match nvidia. Compute performance hasn't changed because they were never really behind there, hence why their cards were always very popular to miners.

I have the freesync version, the vertical lines/interlacing I believe is a gsync module artifact. I used to see these interlacing issues on my XB271hu too, it would come and go and usually be visible at lower framerates, I believe it's got something to do with their variable overdrive and pixel...

I much prefer the better blacks and larger size. Also on the xb271hu I regularly could see pixel inversion artefacts, I'm glad to say I haven't witnessed that issue on this display, picture looks solid. The only downside I can see is weaker black transitions, but here they are probably the best...

I recently picked up the 32GK650F version, which is the freesync equivalent without HDR. I have to say I'm really impressed with the performance, my panel is pixel perfect and I can't detect any backlight bleed or uniformity issues. The only thing that's noticeable is the waterfall effect at the...

nVidia know this product in the market places is pretty much dead in the water thanks to Samsung/LG, hence why they formally announced support for VRR. They'll still sell a few I guess to the hardcore faithful that buy titans etc.

Excellent news, now I can buy one these suckers. https://rog.asus.com/articles/gaming-monitors/the-43-rog-strix-xg438q-does-big-screen-gaming-with-freesync-hdr-2-at-4k-and-120hz/ Enjoy the benefits of 120hz VRR gaming on PC via display port, then play my xbox one X with VRR and plenty of ports...

I have a Sony 43x720e and an Acer XB271HU, I've swapped between these over the last 12 months, I really like the 4k and 43inch size, very immersive and the picture quality on the Sony is better than the Acer. But 60hz is a detriment if you play online competitively, I notice a big drop in KD...