Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Fundamentally MicroLED-backlit LCD is the same thing as current MiniLED-backlit LCD but with orders of magnitude greater dimming zones, and like I said, the limiting factor is likely to be processing power (for now). This does indeed appear to be what plagued the consumer Hisense dual layer TV...
This opens the door to an intriguing possiblity: high zone count RGB MicroLED-backlit LCDs at a somewhat affordable price. Consider the specs for the 108" model AWALL is selling:
108"
16 modules
2560x1440 priced at $30k
1920x1080 priced at $21.5k
Working it out, each of those 16 modules is...
It's important to remember that the terms "4k," "8k" etc. is shorthand that represents the horizontal resolution, not the total number of pixels (which is what matters when driving a display).
4k is the industry shorthand for a resolution of 3840 x 2160, which is about 8.3 million pixels.
8k is...
Why would you want a CRT with FALD? Firstly it doesn't make sense since CRTs aren't backlit, but secondly FALD is a bandaid for LCDs that tries to fix one of its main shortcomings by (poorly) approximating what CRTs already do perfectly: per-pixel light control with no bleeding. An LCD with FALD...
It's notable that the 32" panel with 4608 zones also has four LEDs per zone, which inclines me to think that it's for some other reason than processing power. My guess would be it's to average out any differences in brightness or color temperature between individual LEDs so at least each zone is...
Very cool monitor, but 1440p and lack of VESA mounting make this overall a less versatile option vs. the 42" OLEDs. I was just posting about the reasons for keeping the PPI relatively low on OLED monitors in the near term; lower PPI is more efficient, which = higher brightness and longer...
Not that I know of. Although, all else being equal, smaller pixels need to be run harder to achieve equal brightness as larger ones, which increases power draw and heat output. So it may well be that a higher PPI panel would have more aggressive ABL.
OLED displays used in phones can be designed for high brightness because the lifespan is expected to be much shorter, and running at high brightness will age the emitters much faster, which is what causes burn in. The average phone screen is on for less than 4 hours a day, whereas a desktop...
I'm guessing any 27-30" OLED panels they make will be limited to 1440p, and 1080p for anything less than 27". The pixel aperture ratio probably gets too small for acceptable brightness/lifespan at higher PPI than that.
There seems to be a tradeoff between brightness, lifespan, and pixel density with OLED, and increasing one spec reduces the other two. A 32" 4k has about a 26% higher pixel density than 27" 1440p, so I'm guessing they're trading lower pixel density for higher brightness and/or lifespan for a...