Well i dont have any problems with this board, no blackscreens after bad overclock nothing. i also hacked the bios so i have the voltage options for vcore and vdimm. htt stable up to 304.
that board has only 2 flaws, and that is the 10% slower ram benchmarks, i can get only 7000mb/s at ddr533...
actually the htt goes up to 1300 (max i have tested) but only with 4x multi with 5x wont post at 200core. if the 939 sempron is the same like a venice and you look at the game benchmarks so its the cache which brakes? so an opteron for its price is the best way or an dcopteron. if someone knows...
damn i just red that xbit article , so its not much faster than a 754 sempron :(.
i bought in that fujistusiemens pc (new) for 380$. if you check the oem prices for all the components its about 40-50$ for the sempron. but if you look at the benches its not worth it compared to a opteron 144 or...
cool ;), btw i paid around 380$ for my sys with ga-k8n51gmf-9 mainboard, 2x256ddr, 160gb samsung 7200, dvdr dl, and the sempron 3000+, nice case (fujitsusiemens) , mouse&keyb. now running at 278x9 2500mhz, htt1111, ram 228c2 t1. it is so unfair that the matx board have such lame bioses. the mobo...
why cant i find anything about s939 semprons on the net???
i am using one for 3 months now, only diference to an venice is the cache (core is called venice128 in everest.