Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
No luck here on the desktop or laptop "we're working with our partners" message
Neither will update even trying to force it with the command prompt
So far a fail this end
Most AMD CPU's undervolt quite well, though obviously you won't be doing overclocking.
I undervolted my CPU it's certainly not pulling 95w at full load
Where I live this CPU is actually more expensive than the 6300, thus I don't see the point unless the GPU performance is a factor.
For traditional CPU intensive work the FX Has it beaten clearly
I don't really care I'm not likely to be changing sockets for years. Quite happy with my current FX setup
In 4/5 years time I'll update to a DDR4 12 core something if it's an APU then fine.
I do make the odd build so I might look at the APU's for there.
The problem with the APU concept is...
I use lightroom 5 and the 6300 has no problems with big mp raw files.
Be wary of some benchmarks with PS though I don't use 150 layers and 20 filters thus many benches are pretty much useless!
Either 6300 (forget 6350) or 8320 they're unlocked all the FX processors so why waste money on more...
Problem is if you're not that interested in the APU side of things, and many are not.
Some folks go with a dedicated GPU (for good reason) and on the super budget side you just don't need any kind of power there for an office/basic pc, least no more than the integrated solutions offer.
FM2+...
Current and predicted APU's are not a solution for performance desktop users, if that changes we shall see, but I'm happy with AM3+ and I'm not sure it's dead yet, until official news comes out I'm on the fence.
And the grim reality of all CPU's is that sockets change at some point. AMD has...
FX is a solid CPU but more for budget conscious buyers looking for max bang per buck and doing more meaty type tasks. I used to build Athlon II x4 systems for folks on a budget and doing video/photo work, but without putting a huge dent in the wallet! Everyone was happy with those machines
We...
Well not entirely true there are IPC improvements and I know as I updated from a 6100 to 6300 FX, even running at the same clock speeds there is an uptake on performance with the newer processor. It's not "massive" but still it is improved
10-15% seems about right
Not sure were you've been but lots of software is multi threaded esp photo and video processing software. Those extra 2 cores would give a boost to performance that would smoke the i7's in this kind of application workload.
We've been down the more work per clock cycle road and that's fine...
I don't really see the point of this processor. It would have made a lot more sense to have a 10 threaded/10 core (5 module design) which would have allowed it to really pump things up for heavily threaded applications.
Rather than pumping clock speeds which don't really yield massive gains...