MistaSparkul's latest activity

Could be :ROFLMAO:

They will stop making FLAGSHIP video cards for the gaming market, but I don't see Nvidia making zero gaming cards at all. I can see the biggest Rubin "202" dies or whatever they call it 100% going towards AI cards only while gaming gets the...

I think I'll use the performance gain from the new model to run a double pass of Shortfuse + Lecram with DLAA. Already got it setup in Witcher 3, though currently only playable using DLSS instead of DLAA until the performance improvement lands...

lol that is what I notice about MLID, he literally says anything and everything so he can never be wrong. He will say Nvidia will do something then also say "OR they may not!" That way no matter what the outcome is, he can claim to be right.

Hmm thinking about it some more, we know that OLED burn in has not improved at all on the TV side of things and that every generational improvement went towards boosting brightness instead. My cousin burned in his CX by playing FFXIV with RTX HDR...

Don't get me wrong, more performance is nice, and after trying out this Preset C for myself I don't see any downsides to image quality at first glance....but where the hell is REFLEX 2? The biggest issue with MFG right now is the latency which...

2500 nits HUD is wild :eek: IF true then yeah I suppose 18 hours of 2500 nits static elements can cause burn in, but how do we know it isn't just pulling those numbers out of it's ass or merely going by what someone on reddit claims with no...

Very. Although I must admit, after gaming at 1440p for the past month, it really isn't that terrible anymore thanks to DLAA. 1440p with anything else whether it's FXAA, SMAA, and especially TAA (🤮) just looks so disgustingly blurry/jagged. Still...

Yeah that doesn't seem right. Let's say HUD elements are typically 200 nits, boosting it by 300% would give you 800 nits for the HUD. The G6 is capable of sustaining peak brightness figures well above 2000. There is no way that 18 hours of 800...

Ironically Nvidia just announced today that DLSS5 will run twice as fast on the new model and this is without RTX 60 improvements or even switching to NVFP4.

So a 4ms render cost at 4K instead of 8ms? Guess I'll be back to gaming at 4K this week.

“NVIDIA DLSS 5 Gets 2x Performance Boost with 20% Less VRAM Usage by AleksandarK Today, 06:34 Discuss (6 Comments) NVIDIA's continuous optimization of software and its technology stack has yielded another great improvement. The latest DLSS 5...

That won't stop them because they would just add more memory themselves like they have been doing. There are 4090's with 96GB VRAM.

I think Nvidia will release the 6080 as the 6090 given that they have done something similar in the past when they had the opportunity to. The flagship single GPU Kepler card which was GTX 680 was pretty much a mid range Kepler die branded as the...

I am having deja vu here, I swear there were people whining that PC gaming is so over back when the 5090's MSRP first got announced because the flagship card is now "too expensive" and because nobody can afford the flagship GPU anymore then PC...

Even if this is the final generation of physical hardware, I'm fine with that. Majority of new game releases kinda suck now and thanks to DLSS5 I can basically remaster almost my entire steam library for free so I would just play all my old games...

Read your original post: game developers will also stop making GPU-demanding games if no one can buy a card that'll play them...consoles might be the future of gaming. Are you telling me everybody plays games 4K path traced 165 fps? That's...

A 5080 is still fast enough to play just about everything.

They might as well drop the 6090 from the lineup since AI firms would gobble them up regardless and the street price would be over $10k anyways.

Without any competition I can see why. There is nothing that AMD has that can beat the 5080 anyway so even with the 5090 discontinued, Nvidia would still be #1. Besides, all 5090's right now are just being funneled towards AI anyways and not...