If I extend it to the receiver, it wants me to set resolution, etc.. and then my mouse can go into this void receiver space that has no monitor attached to it.
I just want to send AUDIO ONLY to my receiver via HDMI, no video, no "desktop", etc.. is this even possible?
I did get the 3x1 + 1 as one huge group working...
But, if I powered off the receiver, then my eyefinity group reverts to an ungrouped state.
I need a solution that maintains the eyefinity group without requiring the receiver to be on all the time.
I have a MSI Lightning.
I have a 3 screen eyefinity group connected via 3 displayport outputs.
I can pass HDMI audio to my receiver using the DVI->HDMI adapter, but, I can only do this if I enable the receiver as a display, and thus, breaking my eyefinity group.
How can I still send...
Add the worst case (16ms) and the best case (0ms, same) and average them out with what is likely to happen says that 120hz can display your frames for you in half the time the 60hz can.
It's not squat.
It's the difference of 0-16ms to 0-8ms.
Add that on top of the already large delays most...
Correct, but as I said, the 120hz can get those frames to the user quicker, and thus reducing overall latency.
If you can't increase the frame rate, like in our example, decreasing the latency of the display is another way to reduce your overall latency.
60hz->120hz does that.
Going with a...
Incorrect and correct. While it may display the same frame twice in a row, a 120hz display will still get that frame to your eyes sooner than a 60hz display, thus reducing your overall latency.
You have two things working to get the image to your eyes as fast as possible.
Graphics card...
This is incorrect.
Even if your video card can only output 60fps, a 120hz display can display you those frames quicker than the 60hz.
For example, running at 60fps:
A 60hz display will display you those frames with a delay between 0-16.6ms.
A 120hz display will display you those...