Recent content by lupo

This was a pair of data drives that I have, not the boot drive. I was looking to give it some redundancy, but since I can't use the month board raid controller due to all the RAID cards and the PCI-E SSD card I have as I my boot drive, my bios will not allow me to enable the on board RAID...

As the title said, What happens to RAID 0 array created by windows 7 if OS fails? I have two 100GB SSD drives that I am really only using one of and would like to create a RAID 0 array. Due to the other RAID controllers and PCI-E SSD drives I have in the computer, I can not enable the on board...

...

Delete. Resolved after further testing.

FS: new in box revo drive X2 160 Gb. This drive represents a benchmark in drive speed and incredibly low latency and system access times. Price is $200 shipped within the US. I bought this for a media computer I have and decided I didn't need all the extra speed for this system. I can...

last chance on this before I just install the thing in my other workstation. final price: $200. Buyer covers shipping charges. (should be about $10 shipping depending on what type of shipping is requested.)

Here are some links to the pics of the drive: http://imgur.com/KoT4V http://imgur.com/wgjpO

Did not think that was an issue with the PP fees. I don't want to make this any more complicated. Here is my final deal for everyone: $230 shipped. New in box. I'll cover the shipping fees to sweeten the deal.

Ok, with papal changes factored in I'm asking $230. The shipping cost is up the the choice of shipping the buyer chooses. Figured a standard FedEx ground charge for this card would be between $5-$10.

I am selling an unopened, new in box OCZ RevoDriveX2 160GB. Asking $225. This drive retails from anywhere from $275-$375. PayPal only and only will ship to the US. Buyer pays 3% PP commission and shipping. (Should be about another $15-20) If interested please send me a PM or reply to this...

I broke and rebuilt the entire array using 8k as default. It was set for 256k. It's still initializing so ill benchmark it later when it completes.

I checked the offset of the array using diskpart. Instead of seeing a normal size like 1024 it lists the offset at 129MB. This does not appear correct. Any thoughts? I could reinitialize the array if I had to by first moving the data off of it, but I'm not sure if that will help. Anyone...

Also, if it's an issue with block size, is there a way to force the OS to read/write in block sizes over 1024?

Here is the issue I am facing: I have a high end workstation for PT9 with the 003 control surface. (Connected via fire wire). The C: drive of the system is a revodrive3 PCI-E SSD and the RAID array for storage is a 12TB RAID 5 running off of an Intel RT3WB080 RAID card. Each disk is 7200 RPM...

Thanks for the opinions