Which of the models has the best stand? I know none of them are going to win awards, but my desk is fairly sturdy so I probably won't invest in a third-party stand unless it looks like it's going to break in half.
I apologize if this has already been addressed - I did a search in the thread...
That's a good deal on a domestic 27", and would be less hassle and provide a little more purchase security, but is it worth the $250 jump from the Korean units? I understand the HPs probably have a better stand/casing and quality control, but what about the display itself?
I voiced my concern...
I tend to shy away from SLI/Crossfire - it's been more of a source of frustration than enjoyment in my experiences, but I suppose the option is always there. Heat, noise and power consumption are always concerns too.
I'm trying to avoid sacrificing much detail, although I know that's probably...
I've followed the thread on the Korean monitors, and they seem like a phenomenal deal, although there seems to be a decent chance of a less than perfect unit. I suppose it's a gamble worth investigating for the price involved.
My concern is still powering that 2560x1440 screen in gaming...
TL;DR - Looking for a new gaming display setup. Does it cost too much to maintain a 2560x1600 environment? Would dual monitors be a better solution for productivity vs. gaming performance vs. cost ratio? I'll spend a lot on an upgrade, but I keep my hardware 3-4 years.
--------
Long version...