Recent content by Klapcos

You made me LOL hard here:D at work, thnx So true!

Ran the benchmark. 2560x1440 resolution with everything on max including that advanced blending. Used 2x MSAA. Average fps: 42 Max fps: 75 Min fps: 30 I could see it drop back down to 37 when driving through the forest and going back up when going through landscapes without trees. Without...

I just bought it and installing it now. Gonna test it out in a bit. Good thing I came across your thread because wanted to get it during steam summer sale but totally forgot about it.

Tested it for about 4 hours on 4K with my 980 Ti, no stuttering at all and gsync really keeps it smooth ever at around 30 fps :D

I hate stupid people but hate stupid pc gamers even more.

Said the same thing over at pcper and Ryan agreed on that in their podcast

Why close it, it's an open forum. He is legit with his questions. Aah I see maybe you are just let down by your favorite company after the reviews hit yesterday. ;)

So true even I do on a lot of my steam games, DSR 4K on my 2560x1440 res. monitor

And how much is that adapter gonna cost on top of the Fury X price tag??? Definitely going to be far more than a good GTX980 Ti with all that already included.

Fury X 4K gaming GPU my @ss lol and no HDMI 2.0 :o

2x 980Ti's or wait for pascal. Fury X only has 4GB no matter how fast it will not be enough for upcoming titles Plus if you want HDMI 2.0 all GTX900 series have that, Fury X doesnt.

And no HDMI 2.0 lmfao

F*ck it. Gonna return one card for store credit at overclockers.co.uk and the other can't return as its Palit Jetstream some shit. Might as well run one GTX970 until something better comes along. Come on AMD nows your chance!

I know its hardware but in the driver they can change how aggressive it will and won't use that 0.5GB partition.

Would anyone know of a new beta or when this driver will be out for testing?