Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
And the last few announcements I heard were that greedy counties and towns were offering decade or longer breaks on those asset value taxes to attract data centres which would result in bugger all taxes generated by the data centre itself compared to its damage on the local town.
So in other words, upend your life because someone wanted to build a data centre next door? No thanks. They can't do that near me, but if I lived in a place that had that happen then I'd be furious. I wouldn't be trying to move further away from my job thus making my commute worse and having to...
Yeah, owned asset value doesn't do anything to help me unless I'm borrowing against it or selling it. If I'm borrowing against my house I probably have more financial problems than the earned value on my home is going to help with.
That's the kicker. If they were willing to take on all the cost associated with these data centres it wouldn't be as big a problem. But, they want to build close to towns so they have easier access to power and water but then the noise pisses everyone off. If they were all willing to go build in...
AAA games wouldn't have, yet, no. Anything coming out in 2025 or 2026 would have been in development for a long time before the current rush to include AI in everything.
The dream sounds awesome. But, as with everything, the devil is in the details. If the characters start acting way out of context or with different personalities to the script then it will ruin the game for a lot of people. But, you're right, that at times some NPC's seem oblivious to what is...
Fair point, but I still really don't have a big problem with it. If these companies want to provide a service like this then they need to deal with the consequences. The AI should have safety mechanisms for damaging statements that ensures that there are multiple reliable sources it is drawing...
They're going to have to do what journalists have been doing for decades upon decades ... reference the original content. Do quotes and provide direct reference to the original article. That's what protects journalists when they report on what a suspect source is saying. They're not trying to...
Given the number of exemptions following big money it pretty much wipes out the "security concerns" as nothing but another grift. If they stuck to their guns they might seem silly, but at least honest.
I disagree with the search thing as do the courts. Linking lower or higher isn't showing approval on the content of those pages.
On the AI summary they're liable because they're creating new content based on other content. If it is defensible from the content it drew from they shouldn't have an...
I'm all over that ruling. If their code is what is causing the results then that's on them. I get that the original search ruling was reasonable that just because Google found the website doesn't make it liable for the website contents. In that case, Google had no say in what the website content...
When I read those two quotes I hear one thing .... advertising ... lots of advertising. Partnerships basically means serving more and more advertising so they can offset the cost of the console. Business models, partnerships, thinking "creatively" all means worsening the customer experience to...