Statistical Proof
I guess GDDR4,Memory Frequence increase of 250 isnt a big enough difference.
Once this card has more time on the market and gets reviewed you will see what I mean.
http://www.sapphiretech.com/en/productfiles/matrix-vga-1.xls
I can see you guys are such closeminded fanboys none of this is gonna do any good...
im out.
im talking about the 512mb and 1gb versions of the 2900Pro... not the xt...
Name...............|......2900 Pro......2900 Pro........2900xt.......2900xt
Memory size.....|.........1gb...........512mb...........1gb..............512
Memory...
Ok even with the margin for error they still preform about the same in lower resolution. Did I say that the resolution doesnt matter? I said the amount of memory will determine wether there is a better preformance at higher resolutions.
With that said the 1gb version has a higher memory...
um I think that hotlinked image i showed you kinda says otherwise...
Here another review that show that sometimes the 320 beats the 640..
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/gf8800gts320MB-roundup_11.html#sect1
Here is an extremely helpful Link:
Interactive VGA Charts
Anyways...
if you have your mind set on nvidia then I would suggest the 8800gts 320 mb...
If you dont have your mind set, I would suggest trying the sapphire 2900 1gb pro.. costs a lil more but should be worth it...
Lol I don’t really understand fanboys sometimes.
I personally go for whatever performs better. With that said here are some things you guys should know.
The amount of memory doesn’t nessesarly mean an increase in performance. Some games support the extra memory while other games...