Recent content by GalacticAC

Just want to point out that both of these are important measures. Frame-time could show irregularities that are hidden under or over the measure of fps since frametime can be measured per frame while fps, by nature of the unit, is a moving average. I'll see if I can get fraps to work and run...

I'm not familiar with that one, but if the specs I see are correct they do 1050 L\h and 4.4m of head pressure. A D5 is 1500 and 3.9m, but two D5s in series will double the head pressure(7.8m) and have the same flow(1500 L\h).

Only want to add, radiators will add heat if water temperature in the radiators drop below ambient air temp. I would think loop order here could be of high importance depending on the outlet water temp of the chiller you pick. For flow rates, I found this article...

I notice your CCD 2 on Chip 2 appears to be inline with CCD 1 and 2 from Chip 1 for temperatures. Maybe CCD 1 on Chip 2 is bringing that chip down? Those voltages seem in line with those speeds - in general. Definitely seems like you'd need further thermal headroom to really know what you've...

I patched to version 49922 from 48249. Everything appears as it is going to work, but the game crashes when attempting to load the session. Everything else as it comes with the game seems to still work.

My 3900X seemed to respond nicely to some extra voltage (and cooling!) Personally, the ROI got bad after 1.38V, squeezed another ~50Mhz stable after getting to 1.416V (@80C!!). Dipped my toe in 1.42+ and got nothing much out of it. LLC was 'Turbo' in Aorus Master which is 3rd out of 5...

I'll get that patch installed when I get home, if you can share that dynamic benchmark (google drive ought to work), I'll get frameview going so we get that apples to apple test. I can declock to 3.0 later, I'm guessing the fps will be around 25. If you want a direct clock for clock comparison...

Thank you, this is so much better. Focusing on the data is great. The high error and the change in direction is what was driving me to say there was a lack of a clear answer. I've settled in on a pretty good overclock. 4.525 on fastest CCX, lowest made it to 4.4 and the rest are in between...

While I wouldn't bet on it, it is possible the overclock the Fclk to maintain 1:1 on higher bandwidth memory. Mine went to 1900 with a single click no problem. Here's what I've got

This was not my intention, if taken out of context that would be mis-characterized, but we've only been talking about one game and one synthetic test for days now, so I believe that you're nitpicking here. Here is a summary of data, 2600k 24 32M SPI 411.077s. TS12 - 32FPS...

You state this as gospel, yet we have some data points from this very thread that support this theory and some that don't. That's my entire problem here.

I also had G-sync enabled on my tests. If we had frameview across the board surely that would only serve to increase the accuracy of results. It is worth noting, the in-game video settings also play a large role in forcing the game to be CPU bound, but it's still not rocket science.

FWIW, I did my testing while the train was stationary.

I wouldn't go as far to say pointless, but yeah Custom loops are hardly ever a "need". I do plan on adding a waterblocked 2080ti in short order which will better use that capacity. I'm also a fan of the silence, it's all packed into an R6 case. I did almost go with noctua-12s, saving the...

Oh wow. Okay ... lets be honest here. Are we posting here to pass time/argue or figure something out? Personally I think going into the future, if you're still playing TS12 you're going to need to bench the actual game to know if newer and newer CPUs will beat your Sandy Bridge. But...