• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Recent content by facebook

  1. F

    3 x 2560x1600 on HD 7750

    I am a developer, lots of windows open if you do the server part for web applications. Stepping up to 7770 seems to be need if this should work
  2. F

    3 x 2560x1600 on HD 7750

    Is it possible to use three 30" monitors using a HD 7750 on 2560x1600 ? What type of splitter works if I need to put two or three monitors on one displayport?
  3. F

    I think it all boils down to: Bulldozer was not ready to release

    Idle power is good and that is most important, With AMD you don't need to buy as many motherboards as with intel I hope GF will improve the power consumption on higher clocks
  4. F

    Is Bulldozer really this bad?

    Who needs good singlethreaded performance?
  5. F

    I think it all boils down to: Bulldozer was not ready to release

    Those that actually need a fast cpu gets a fast cpu with bulldozer because most processor intensive applications are threaded.
  6. F

    So what went wrong with BD?

    Llano is thuban on 32nm Bulldozer on Photoshop CS5 http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8150-zambezi-bulldozer-990fx,3043-15.html Photoshop CS4 Bulldozer runs well on newer applications that need a fast cpu
  7. F

    So what went wrong with BD?

    It doesn't perform like shit, what it does is that it doesn't live up to expected performance. They need to focus on L1 cache speed
  8. F

    why choose BD of any variety over a 2500K?

    The lowest FPS values are higher on bulldozer
  9. F

    Why are you surprised about Bulldozer's performance?

    That is the main problem. I think AMD hoped for clocks about 4.0-4.2 and turbo 4.6-4.8. Maybe it will be there the next or next-next stepping.
  10. F

    Why are you surprised about Bulldozer's performance?

    Just read: http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx-8150--8120-6100-and-4100-performance-review/
  11. F

    Why are you surprised about Bulldozer's performance?

    Todays programs don't need quads or more Here is one game that shows the future http://www.pcgames.de/Battlefield-3-PC-221396/News/Battlefield-3-Benchmarks-mit-AMDs-Bulldozer-im-Vergleich-zu-Phenom-2-X6-und-Intels-i7-veroeffentlicht-850268/
  12. F

    Bulldozer performance issues caused by motherboard in press kit?

    Gigabyte 990 FXA-UD7 http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/zardon/amd-fx-8150-black-edition-8-core-review-with-gigabyte-990fxa-ud7/ http://forums.extremeoverclocking.com/showthread.php?t=358508&page=3 ASRock 990FX Extreme4...
  13. F

    BD Observation A :

    Llano!
  14. F

    So what went wrong with BD?

    Write speed for L1 cache sucks http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/4348/amd_fx_8150_am3_3_6ghz_bulldozer_cpu_review/index6.html
  15. F

    Bulldozer, best gamer cpu because high min values?

    Not for me. The lowest 5% is the most important average fps on BF3 for bulldozer is ok though, maybe better than intel
See more
Back
Top