• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Recent content by dmens

  1. D

    Anyone regret going i7?

    hells no. x264 loves i7.
  2. D

    Core i7 exprience

    got my system up and running on friday using a Noctua NH-U12P SE1366
  3. D

    *POST* your i7 setup specks

    ASUS P6T Deluxe core i7 ??? - work perk. faster than 965 EE. Noctua NH-U12P SE1366 G.SKILL 6GB (3 x 2GB) DDR3 1333 Intel X25-M SSD for boot Sapphire Radeon 4850 X2 everything else is irrelevant. hopefully all the parts arrive mid next week.
  4. D

    Fuad: Intel to follow AMD's lead with triple core cpu's

    complete garbage. faud is a fool.
  5. D

    Reverse HyperThreading...?

    The funniest thing in the thread is you describing your absurdist ideas in the first person.
  6. D

    Reverse HyperThreading...?

    It is difficult to respond to a post that has no meaning (specifically, duby's posts). In regards to sentence 5, that was a rhetorical question. To be honest, I can't really offer any more specifics from my point of view without violating NDA, and AMD's LWP specification is available for all...
  7. D

    Reverse HyperThreading...?

    Don't bother, you have no clue what you're talking about. I've been in the field long enough to know bullshit when I read it. You were confused by profiling and still don't know what it is, you are completely confused about the theoretical idea of "RHT", and your ideas about asymmetric...
  8. D

    Reverse HyperThreading...?

    Nice one. I can hardly figure out what you're saying anyways, you've horribly mangled the concepts of thread level parallelism. Why were you talking about branches again: WTF? I can barely link your stringy line of conceptual ideas together... :rolleyes: Moving onto asymmetric processing...
  9. D

    Reverse HyperThreading...?

    It doesn't add up to "RHT", that's for sure. LOL.
  10. D

    Reverse HyperThreading...?

    Who is "we"? Good luck doing general purpose work with that kind of machine.
  11. D

    Reverse HyperThreading...?

    Absolutely, this extension can be used to tweak anything. So the claim that this is especially beneficial for multithreaded apps seems like an AMD marketing pitch to me.
  12. D

    Reverse HyperThreading...?

    That's not even what LWP does. Go read the spec. As for "RHT", it is the exact opposite of power efficiency, so why even bother doing it, especially when the processor is rarely "wrong" to begin with.
  13. D

    Reverse HyperThreading...?

    Those amdzone people are retarded. LWP is just perfmon with feedback to software. Intel has announced something similar months ago (RT, I believe) Back to topic, big fat no. No matter how you cut it, LWP and RT do not allow one thread to execute on two or more cores.
  14. D

    More of the same....

    You know, only the truly desperate fanboy would resort to crazy conspiracy theories about whether the conroe demos in March 06 were rigged. They weren't because there was absolutely no reason to rig a damn thing, as everyone knows by now. The thing was a genuine *underclocked* C2D, and it was...
  15. D

    Barcelona @ 1.6GHz benched by Dailytech!

    Hah, I worked on P4D and I remember the exact day it came out publicly and there was a big bunch of hoorah about coming out to market before X2. Quit with the revisionist history. Do you recall store availability? I doubt it, since there is no way you actually bought a P4D.
See more
Back
Top