Recent content by Dead Things

Welp, add my name to this list. Three and a half months outside of warranty, and the top just went shady on me as of this morning.

Just saw this now. Sad news. 7im was indeed a fierce fah supporter! In folding heaven, -bigadv is still a thing. Fold on, 7im!

I've got an extry Opty 180 if you're in the market for it. I'd be shipping from Toronto, though. PM=good. Cheers!

Why more than retail on both parts?

Nobody's saying anything about recruitment. And careful with those "cheap" comments, chief.

Totally agree. Forced team switching is definitely a downfall of Curecoin - one I was hoping they'd address before launch. But given the immediate success of the coin, I now doubt it will ever happen. Personally, I had my sights set on reaching 1B before January with my original team, but...

I know a big chunk of this community has migrated away from FAH, so thought I'd point out that not only can your fold for coin with Curecoin, but you can also BOINC for coin with Gridcoin. No idea about profitability, but I figure if you can defray even a portion of the costs associated with...

tear, does the PG announcement affect intentions to develop IL/AD support for OCNG? FWIW, I am still eager. Cheers!

Just to help you find the right stuff, PC133 is SDRAM, not DDR1.

Exciting news! Happy to have donated a wee bit to its development as a way of saying 'thanks'!

Yeah, but isn't it weird to say scaling from 64 threads to 128 threads is 90% efficient when it's actually impossible? I realize that's not what 7im was saying, but it is what tear says 7im was describing...

Can you even get Windows to do anything more than -smp 64? I thought with processor groups, 64 logical threads was the most Windows could deploy to any single task...

Good point. I think it might be a bit of both since it was the same machine that got upgraded. The 8860's might be contributing to some of those numbers for the older units. I cannot say for certain, though - I got rid of that rig a number of months ago.

Think you mean 1.86M PPD. But would scaling from 80 to 160 threads be 100% efficient like that?

I was just going off memory, but your results seemed lower than I remembered, so it inspired me to look up my old HFM logs... P8101: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:11:33 - 442,720 PPD P8102: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:08:52 - 657,987 PPD P8103: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:08:58 - 647,047 PPD P8104: Avg...