Recent content by crislevinZTAMPj

where did you find fury for $240?

IF you have a different interpretation of his evidence, do share.

Guy is pretty smart, data analysist.

Perhaps a re-bench is needed.

does this game NEED to be so demanding on graphic cards?

Aren't fans made by AIB partners?

by ultra wide, i assume you meant 3440x1440. The fps on that seems to be 1.6x worse than 1080p, and 1.5x better than 2160p. For overwatch, anything from 470 or 1060 and above are good enough for ~60 fps.

Why not wait a month for VEGA? it seems they will offer more than 3 SKUs for vega. They might produce a Vega Nano just like Fury Nano. If the leaks are true, this would be 10-30% faster than 1080, and will do a great job at 4k.

did I miss your source to that statement?

Huge gaming bottleneck? Like..... isn't 60fps enough@1080p?

Just come in to say hi. 1700+MSI tomahawk. with my 295x2 and EVGA 1025 PSU. I moved over from a 4790k. I know its not an upgrade for gaming (at least for now), my display is between 2k and 4k. Its gonna be GPU bound for me one way or another, its just good to know my CPU won't be dragging my...

do you guys think OC in BIOS is better or OC using Ryzen Master is better? I have a MSI board, which does allow me to set clock and voltage.

i wouldn't call it poorly. not as good as 7700k? yes. Unplayable fps? surely not. will it improve? seems so.

Again, I'd like to hear the details. 20 years experiences is not the same as perfectly unbiased reviews. You can be 20 years loyal to one party too. Age=/=credibility.

Obviously all of these will do the job fine for you, but for pure value..... and possible a better display later on... For that budget, 270x is probably a much better buy than 750Ti. nVidia doesn't seem to support older generation card well (or they don't want to? lol), and indeed DX12 will...