Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Glad my eyes are not deceiving me. I noticed the same thing with my XTX vs the 4090. It's because the 240hz activates the LFC window at 120hz so 90 fps on the XTX runs at 180hz and is cleaner than a 409p running at 120 fps but at 120hz.
Is there a reason why HDMI 2.1 on these 7000 series cards does allow for 240hz at native resolution but this same 2.1 port on the last gen AMD 6000 series or the Nvidia 4000 series doesn't? I was assuming AMD on their 7000 series cards just disables all other ports and uses all the display...
Its still stretching the screen using this option. I think the monitor software is the reason why.
I can create a custom resolution of 3840 X 2160p which does work because in the monitor HUD, I can set the Screen Size to "27 16:9" and I can see black bars on the side with sharp 4k but then VRR...
I figured out why the motion clarity is far superior on the 240hz mode at lower frame rates vis a vis higher frame rates at 240hz. The monitor essentially does frame duplication in the 240hz mode, so if you get 90 FPS on 240hz mode, the monitor essentially runs this at 180hz and it ends up...
Ah I just saw you have a 4090 so you wouldn't be able to test this but its not that straightforward.
The monitor behaves very differently depending on whether you are in the 240hz and 120hz at a lower frame rate. I am not sure as to the technical explanation why.
For instance, I am getting 100...
How does the motion performance of this Neo G9 57 when playing at 7680x2160p 120hz compare to the CX OLED? Any motion blur? Do you find the oled motion significantly better?
I got it exchanged for a new panel and this one has no dead pixels. Scanlines seem a bit worse though but I found the dead pixel to be more annoying so pretty happy with this.
I must say this monitor is incredible for both productivity and gaming. For context, I own an OLED G9 and I didn't...
Does anyone think it's worth entering the panel replacement roulette for this monitor?
I have a dead pixel but it's in the bottom left corner of the display.
Is it worth looking for a replacement as I am in the return period or do they all have it?
I saw the early access review of the Neo G9 57 on Rtings. Motion performance on this thing is insane. Total response time of 5ms (vs. 9ms. on the Neo G9 49) and there is virtually zero overshoot in the 240hz mode. This panel hangs with OLED displays in terms of motion clarity without artifacts...