Recent content by Bexster

imagine if nVidia made a nVidia game, low api programming - built especially for pc hardware (no console port) or if ati did. kinda like when Epic made a game for the unreal engine. and make it run on the competitors hardware, but in a lesser way (to entice people to buy brand A or B) or run...

Quantum Dot = wide color gamut, and Quantum Dot =! HDR..

Sorry, i don't think so, 16:10 seems to have a hard time, and the proffesional audience doesn't want to pay G-sync. (imho) but they do have a 32" 4K Gsync version, only just 60Hz and 16:9 instead of 16:10. i dream of the day when a large and quick VA sync'd monitor arrives (32"+/min...

makes alot of sense, i did not consider that angle :)

well, people should pick what people want, some people love the 24" inch version - the 24" has better dpi and higher Hz (165 vs. 144) - but i would still trade these two for a bigger screen, because in imho the tradeoff is small, but i can see how other people might feel differently. i have a...

thats a matter of oppinion - i would allways choose the 27" because i just like big screens, so imho the 27" version blows all other 24" monitors away..

i have 3x1440p mg297q on a single 1080gtx - and i love it - and my solution is without gsync wanted to do freesync - but since ati/amd still lack a card in this class i'll wait. Positives for me (YMMW) sync is not as big a deal on 144hz monitors (i notice tearing a lot less) - still would love...

I tend to not really care what people call it - and i welcome all debate with people calling it whatever they please - as long as they can communicate which one they are talkiing about - Pitan X should be just as fast and efficient no mather what nickname people come up with..

Techforums have all kinds of hidden ailments.. in other news, they really should have named it otherwise.. so therefore i fully endorse PitanX