Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Would this be the reason I keep seeing this?
14:59:04] + Attempting to send results [June 15 14:59:04 UTC]
14:59:09] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
14:59:09] (171.67.108.25:8080)
14:59:09] + Retrying using alternative port
14:59:14] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)...
Yes, my PPD has been improving as it moves along. There was plenty of stopping and starting in the middle there. Without the GPU going it's running at an acceptable level. I have my laptop folding now also, but it's only a Core Solo processor.
With the GPU folder turned off it's taking 11-12 minutes per step. This is while I'm using the computer for work. 2-3 times faster than when the GPU folder was on. CPU-Z says clock speed of 3002.9 MHz.
Yes, I have my passkey installed. It appears I'm getting 374 PPD with the GPU off. Anyway to have both run to get the benefits of that, or should I just run the SMP?
Thanks for the coretemp program, got that running now.
That's the guide I followed to install it. Here's my log (or at least the last section of it):
# Windows SMP Console Edition #################################################...
HFM.net says right now that the PPD is 107. I went through the advanced config and there was a setting for "disable CPU affinity lock" which defaults to "no." From my reading of it, it seems that it's better to have that set to "yes" so that's what I did. Is that right?
Also, I haven't...
I had the SMP client installed, but that was even lower on the PPD scale. It looked like I would get 1 unit done in 3-4 days (if that). From what I read, it seemed like you needed at least a quad-core to get the SMP units done in time. Am I reading things wrong?
I've gone through the FAQs, and the SMP and the regular CPU folding program, but I think I'm doing something wrong.
I have a Core 2 Duo E8400 and according to HFM.net my PPD for the CPU is 221.6 while the PPD for my GPU is 1685.1. Are these numbers in line with what's expected, or does...
Is there any specific settings I need to set up to have 2 running at the same time without bogging down my system? I turned the GPU client on and saw CPU usage go to 100%
I have the system up and running now, and had a little confusion as to which folding program I should run. I think I'm all set now though.
Right now I have the CPU client running, but it doesn't seem to be cranking out as many units as the GPU client was doing for me. For my set up what...