Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Thanks for the tip, it is a about 20% more expensive here, but that is within stirking distance so I will check it out.
I am not sure what the comprehensive remote control gives me, aren't Intel vPRO supposed to give me remote control in any case? Or have I misunderstood?
The P9D-E/4L has...
I am looking at the Asus P9D WS for mye fileserver, for the following reasons:
https://www.asus.com/Motherboards/P9D_WS/
Pretty cheap for a C226 board.
C226, so it has inbuilt VGA
Dual intel LAN
However i also have some concerns:
Are Vpro/KVM guranteed to be supported due to CPU and...
I am looking for å motherboard, preferably c226 (having onboard video is useful), I will be using it for a viritualization setup in my home, so me needs are not so high, but I would also like the board to have at least 8 or 10 s-ata-slots if possible, and also be somewhat reasonbly priced for a...
I see my post can be misunderstood, I ment that 7200 rpm was the norm even a decade ago for 3,5 inch HDDs, a decade ago is when sata was introduced too. If anything, lower spin speeds is more normal now than it was 10 years ago.
I recently got an "1 bit ECC RAM error" from my areca-card which is labeled as "urgent", but is this really a problem? Isnt this only a single bit-fault that has been corrected? It is the first time it has happend after running many years.
Do new drives spin much faster? 7200 Rpm was the norm even a decade ago for 3,5, I would say new drives in average spin slower, since its much more normal with sub 7200 rpm rate now than it was.
That was the one in the forefront of my mind when i wrote the reply, the article has some valid points, but is full of oddities and what i can only think is misunderstandings. That article is much poorer work than the backblaze-article it is criticizing.
Really? The critique of the test I have seen has frankly been pretty poorly thought out, with 80% misunderstandings and 20% "The data could have been more optimal", as it always can be (backblaze haven't made a scientific study), but as long as people can't find a even better study, the data...
The card has the choice it IMHO always should use. Send an alarm when it hits an URE, continue the rebuilding, and warn about the URE in the log. For most people, 99.9% recovery is better than 0%
I see many articles claiming that the controller will automatically fail the rebuild if it runs into a URE (unrecoverable read error) during a rebuild, is that actually the case for areca-cards, or others? Seems like pretty stupid behavior.
You still have 50% more data for the same price
Thats a false dilemma, you are neither guaranteed to loose data with r5, or guaranteed not to loose data on r6. I personally would run backup either way, and I have never been in the situation of two drive failures within a few days of each other.