heatlesssun
Extremely [H]
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2005
- Messages
- 44,154
Why does everyone leave out Windows Bob on all the graphics?
Bob wasn't an OS but a UI layer for 3.1 and 95.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why does everyone leave out Windows Bob on all the graphics?
And immediately, you divide yourself directly into the "proclaimed techie" group.
XP /= 9x. XP = NT.
If something works with Windows 7, it should work with Windows 8(.1). There are no massive kernel compatibility changes as we saw with the transition from XP (9x) to 7 (NT).
Yes, that's my mistake.
Thankfully, it has zero bearing on my actual point, which you conveniently fail to addressbecause hey, backhanded remarks are fun!
In many ways Windows 7 is no different then Vista, but we love 7 and hate vista. Why? Vista had so many problems at first that it gained a bad reputation. Driver updates, service packs later and most of the problems were solved, but people remember all the bad. So eventually Microsoft farted out 7 to get a fresh start.LMAO
As pointed out earlier. So much fail in that statement.
Windows 2000 was NT 5.0.
XP was 5.1-5.2.
Vista was NT 6.0. Windows 7 is NT 6.1.
Windows 8 is NT 6.2 and windows 8.1 is NT 6.3.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT
No major kernel point revision since Vista. There is a reason they called Windows 7 "Vista R2" internally for a long time. They rebuilt NT for Vista, (you old enough top remember "Longhorn") and have been revising since then on the same platform with slight optimizations and new wrappers.