If anyone wanted to take a peek at this one.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3050-6-gb/
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3050-6-gb/
![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Nvidia 3050 6GB review
- Thread starter wandplus
- Start date
ZeroBarrier
Gawd
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 1,012
It's pretty amazing how this turd of a card makes the 6500xt look like a straight insult from AMD. Nvidia was straight scraping the barrel with this garbage and still made a better card than the competition. I'm at a loss for words.
Last edited:
OKC Yeakey Trentadue
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2021
- Messages
- 1,210
HUB finally reviews the mini 3050:
View: https://youtu.be/eRVYK9LtHLc?si=62Qlx4Dq_SaM4xns
His only real complaint was the naming. The Radeon 6600 is a better bang for the buck but the 3050 6 gb has some nice benefits: efficiency, form factor, no 6 pin, Cuda encoding, RTX.
Interesting that nvidia still seems to be a bit more efficient with vram. AMD seems to take a dump in a few titles with 4gb vram, even on 1080p low while the 1650 Super holds on. While 8GB is falling short on the high end, 6 GB still looks to be good enough on the low end.
View: https://youtu.be/eRVYK9LtHLc?si=62Qlx4Dq_SaM4xns
His only real complaint was the naming. The Radeon 6600 is a better bang for the buck but the 3050 6 gb has some nice benefits: efficiency, form factor, no 6 pin, Cuda encoding, RTX.
Interesting that nvidia still seems to be a bit more efficient with vram. AMD seems to take a dump in a few titles with 4gb vram, even on 1080p low while the 1650 Super holds on. While 8GB is falling short on the high end, 6 GB still looks to be good enough on the low end.