AMD's sole Jaguar-based tablet CPU was introduced 5 months ago, and there have been no design wins announced so far. A prototype Windows system popped up in the GFXBench results and it may be the unreleased Asus X102BA, which is a netbook with the A4-1200, shown early last month.
The A4-1200 is a dual core Jaguar-based CPU running at 1GHz (1MB total L2) with a 128 GCN core GPU running at 225MHz. The CPU has a 3.9W TDP. For comparison, the Bay Trail Atom Z3740 has 4 EU "gen 7" (same GPU execution unit architecture as Ivy Bridge, with 4 ALUs per EU) GPU. It's a quad core processor, but the graphics tests are made to stress the GPU, not CPU.
http://gfxbench.com/compare.jsp?D1=AMD+Radeon+HD+8180&D2=Asus+T100TA+Transformer+Book&cols=2
Overall the 4 EU (16 ALU) Atom is pretty close in performance to 128 GCN Jaguar CPU, but on-screen the Atom tablet has a 10-20% performance advantage in all of the tests. The A4-1200 has higher triangle throughput rates, but those don't seem to help RL performance.
I couldn't find any A4-1200 CPU benchmarks, but those are probably abysmal at 1GHz.
The A4-1200 is a dual core Jaguar-based CPU running at 1GHz (1MB total L2) with a 128 GCN core GPU running at 225MHz. The CPU has a 3.9W TDP. For comparison, the Bay Trail Atom Z3740 has 4 EU "gen 7" (same GPU execution unit architecture as Ivy Bridge, with 4 ALUs per EU) GPU. It's a quad core processor, but the graphics tests are made to stress the GPU, not CPU.
http://gfxbench.com/compare.jsp?D1=AMD+Radeon+HD+8180&D2=Asus+T100TA+Transformer+Book&cols=2
Overall the 4 EU (16 ALU) Atom is pretty close in performance to 128 GCN Jaguar CPU, but on-screen the Atom tablet has a 10-20% performance advantage in all of the tests. The A4-1200 has higher triangle throughput rates, but those don't seem to help RL performance.
I couldn't find any A4-1200 CPU benchmarks, but those are probably abysmal at 1GHz.