harbingerofdoom
Gawd
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2007
- Messages
- 845
I hate color movies. It makes things too real. Movies should be black and white.
and that talking and music and sound??? horrible!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hate color movies. It makes things too real. Movies should be black and white.
I knew this would happen. Everyone I know hates watching movies on my Samsung TV with smooth motion that makes everything seem more fluid, especially blurays. I on the other hand love it, Band of Brothers is amazing on bluray with the higher refresh rates. But it is very different from a cinematic perspective. Sometimes it makes movies seem more like sitcom's because it's not something you commonly see in theaters but you do on TV shows.
Postprocessing can fix any of that, right?
I can't knock it though until I see it, and who knowsthis might be completely differnt than anything else displayed before. I do however wonder why they picked 48 instead of a round 50 or better yet a standard 60.
The mounts, which allow one camera to be pointed straight at the subject while the other shoots the image reflected off a mirror, lets camera operators change the distance between the two camera lenses--called the interocular distance--easily. This keeps the lenses at a distance similar to our own eyes and should ensure that the 3D effect looks more believable and causes less fatigue.
The movie is also shot at 5K resolution--more than six times that of 1080p--at 48 frames per second,
This is dumb. Everybody knows the human eye can't see anymore than 24 frames per second. It's probably just a plot by the entertainment industry to sell twice as many rolls of film.
This is dumb. Everybody knows the human eye can't see anymore than 24 frames per second. It's probably just a plot by the entertainment industry to sell twice as many rolls of film.
Sorry, the human eye and 24 FPS myth is just that. A myth.
i'd prefer it if film makers filmed everything at 1k fps and released it at all the current popular fps's
i am sick and tired of panning scenes looking like a quick slideshow
i am sick of watching a massive blur attack on my screen during action scenes
i am sick of stupid assumptions that high fps and realistic shit will be "too real" beacause really, why would i pay for a blu ray if i didn't want it to be more "realistic"?
i want 72 fps films right now, its closer to what almost everyone views at home anyways (60-75hz) and there is no reason to not film in higher fps, if people really DON'T like it they can still release it at 24fps, but you can't release a 24fps at 48 or 72
The big problem as I see it is that cheap and shitty productions have been using high frame rates for a long time. It's like someone decides that the latest and greatest dinnerware is going to be made of plastic. Ok... That's great and all... but you're going to have a hell of a time convincing people that plastic fork is great and not some cheap nasty shit. Also, claiming higher frame rates creates "smoother" video is the biggest line of bullshit I've ever seen.
And yes there is a reason not to. The faster your frame rate, the faster your shutter speed. Faster =/= better.
Theaters should offer playing the 48fps movie @ 24fps. The movie will last twice as long!
OMG! They are going to inject our children with violence and sex at twice the speed!!! SAVE OUR CHILDREN!!
Well try not to forget it's possible to shoot movies digitally now, like how it was done with Star Wars Attack of the Clones. Since it's digital video there is no shutter speed right?
I prefer the looks of 24fps in movies, it's not about realism but texture. It could be a subjective matter but many viewers agree with that. Happens the same at work when I show clients stuff filmed @24fps, they all agree it looks nicer.
Gaming is another matter, gimme the highest framerates because I'm fighting for my life!
...and no micro stuttering please
This is dumb. Everybody knows the human eye can't see anymore than 24 frames per second. It's probably just a plot by the entertainment industry to sell twice as many rolls of film.
Not on the EPIC, or on any decent pro DV camera I'm aware of. The shutter speed is independent of the frame rate.The faster your frame rate, the faster your shutter speed. Faster =/= better.
Not on the EPIC, or on any decent pro DV camera I'm aware of. The shutter speed is independent of the frame rate.
I'm tired of when fast paced action movies show a new camera perspective every three frames. You can't see anything but blur and things being thrown around and everything is zoomed in. It's a crappy way of filming action with a cheap budget.
There's a Sharp tv @ the frys nearby playing Tron over and over. The contrast ratio is great, but motion looks...odd. I don't think it's the movie, but honestly can't recall. Is that "TV" 120 or 240 hz? Or "smooth vision?" I have a 120 hz pc display, but that doesn't do anything funky to movies. Overall, I would say it makes the film look like a cheap made for tv movie.