![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
cute "cat-like dog"
.
Well it didnt take until Monday. I guess i owe you some pretzels.
Did you notice any difference in contrast/color/saturation? The VA panel of the Samsung looks like a $129 monitor next to OLED.
^^^pretty much what I thought was gonna happen if I got the 57. That and it would have been too wide on my desk next to the aw32 haha.
Problem with my current setup is it uses 3 high refresh 4k displays and 4090 only has enough bandwidth to support 2, so the third monitor has to be run off laptop...but in a way that is fine because I don't have to tax my productivity / gaming rig with trivialities.
If those dualup displays supported higher refresh rates I'd have got one but 60hz is a no go for anything. Lowest I'll tolerate is 120 even for watching 30fps streams
this one is pretty similar to my setup, just smaller screens than mine. He's using a 42" C2 OLED with LG Ultragear 32inch 1440p on each side. I use a 48" LG CX OLED in the middle on mine, + two 43" 4k as the portrait mode screens. I decoupled the desk from the screens entirely and set back farther with the peripherals than this so I can view my large array from around 40" away +/- depending on what I'm doing.
For reference, this is a 42" OLED with a LG dual up:
Over/under setup (48" top screen, and it's not the 57" super ultrawide version in this pic) This kind of thing would be better off decoupled from the desk and set back some imo. That way the screens could sit a little lower so the top one wouldn't be so high up. The cutoff at the edge of the desk would be lower to your perspective if they were farther away. If you pole mounted the screens far enough away you could shuffle them down enough so that they'd be more ergonomic than this, but the problem with ultrawides is that the shrinkage vs distance effect is a lot more abrupt vs their (short) dimensions.
a 55" 4k 165hz FALD ark with a few 144hz 32" (only 1440p) side screens from someone on reddit. For this kind of thing I'd have to use some black felt or something on those gaps, or would prob use side screens w/o curvature to be able to press the bezels together. Imo this is also sitting way too close. You'd get to the center of curvature of the 55" ark at around 40" view distance, which would also have the benefit of breaking the 60 PPD point at around 62 PPD where otherwise you'd have pretty large pixel sizes not to mention the viewing angle on the whole array, even allowing for head turning, when sitting this close is extremely cramped.
Two 49 inch super ultrwides + a side screen. Peripherals/viewing distance looks way too cramped here but it's a neat array. He said he was able to get 120hz on the two uw's at max rez, idk about the side screen.
Two G95NC 57" 7680x2160 screens stacked (in another cramped against the window pane setup). He was running both at 120hz off of a mac.
A crazy 3x 55" 165hz 4k Samsung Ark racing setup. Not something I'd do but I though it was interesting. (They run these three screens at 120hz 4k).
.
I decided against a 57" 240hz s-uw screen in the end. Still looking forward to a 240hz screen upgrade someday though. Maybe even a 65" 8k 900D, which can upscale 4k at 240hz or do 8k at 120hz, when the price normalizes to a few grand or so, sub-3k usd preferably rather than over 3k (months later than it's release).
Some 8k screens at pcs. Maybe someday they'll make a 1000R curved one, and one with full displayport 2.1 80Gbps would be a big bonus, but I'm not holding my breath.
.
Marketing picture (the lightweight glasses are mostly 1080p 120hz now and clunky functionality so far) - but it's probably the future of things in the longer run years from now, with lightweight sunglass form factors and much higher rez than the glasses get now, along with "holographic" (via the binocular 3d rendering capability of VR/MR/XR glasses) game scenes scaled onto tables, floors, or on planes in space. That and cutaways of walls or ripped areas of space in your room to game worlds "full size".
.
.
Hmm.. could be that the pg32uqx is indeed using DSC - so that means only one monitor can run DSC? Is it possible to turn DSC "off" for the asus monitor? If so, how?
The color saturation on the Oled is better. Hard to say when it comes to fully objective levels of contrast from a highlights perspective as the 57 inch is just so bright that it makes everything kind of stand out on the display.
Ah shit I didn't know they were 60HZ. Why is anyone still making 60HZ panels for ANYTHING anymore. I literally just assumed they were 120.
Just get the Innocn I linked and run it in portrait if you want a dual up... 4k160 is very nice companion display.....unless you already have that big 75" hooked up to same pc....nvidia gpus not liking more than two 4k high refresh displays
I can't even plug in the third display (second innocn 27 4k160) without NVCP going nuts. If I plug it in I can only select two of the three displays at a time, and if I select the AW32 I can only run 120hz.
What's the big deal about getting a larger screen and splitting it? How many screens to you need? Can't you just window what you're doing?
Lol I suppose if you wanna deal with all that shit on your desk and all those wires. I've had 3 monitors on my desk at one point and I just threw the other 2 away haha a big ass single display to rule them all. But yeah you can have 10 monitors if you like go for it bruh
I'm interested in the rog swift pg27 with gsync pulse supposedly coming out later this year as long as its 4k...if it's 1440peee then I don't care
I need 1 and a half monitors for productivity work....I also like to have a monitor dedicated to videos....so that's 3 right there...the laptop is to power the 3rd 4k display because nvidia is gheyLol I suppose if you wanna deal with all that shit on your desk and all those wires. I've had 3 monitors on my desk at one point and I just threw the other 2 away haha a big ass single display to rule them all. But yeah you can have 10 monitors if you like go for it bruh
Lol I suppose if you wanna deal with all that shit on your desk and all those wires. I've had 3 monitors on my desk at one point and I just threw the other 2 away haha a big ass single display to rule them all. But yeah you can have 10 monitors if you like go for it bruh
Congrats man! Lol sometimes the solution is jankyness or ju ju voodooWell, you guys aren't going to believe it, but the 120hz/240hz bug has been SOLVED!
I got yet another DP 2.1 cable (DP80 certified from "Club") and the monitor STILL showed only 120hz when booting up and/or restarting.
So, I decided to plug the AW3225QF into the LAST DP PORT on the RTX 4090 and switch the Asus PG32UQX to the 3rd DP port and guess what, 240Hz is persistent across reboots and/or startup! Tested it like 10 times to confirm and 240Hz remains in NVCP on the AW!
I went back to the original DP cable that came in the box (DP 1.4) and 240Hz is still persistent so all is well!
w00t!
Now I can see myself getting owned in MWIII at 240Hz!
The only other 'bug' that remains is that Dolby Vision is 'locked' (aka is always "ON") but I guess Dell is already working on a firmware to address that so I'm not too concerned about it. The main thing was 4K 240Hz while the PG32UQX is 4K 144Hz.
Died already? What happened?
today it freaked out and is washed out white, but i can still see the menu and etc, maybe it's the back light? i don't know... i can still see everything but it's like this. i even reset it to factory default
Weird I just thumped the screen with my finger a few times and it’s looking better
no change or improvement from my monitor after sitting unplugged all night..
