Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Casual Lurker said:"Now take our advice. You are barking up the wrong tree little doggy."
It's things like this that keep Kyle's lawyers employed. His entire response was well written up until this line. I don't believe you're looking for a swift resolution to this matter Kyle with a response like that.
Captboom said:You talk about freedom of speach and the constitution and yet you play the whole censorship game. Your a Hypocrite!!!!
MemberSince said:
overclock said:I hate poor grammar. Go take a simple english class. It is not
Your a Hypocrite!
but
You're a hypocrite!
Your shows possiveness. You're is a contraction for you are.
Anyways, shouldn't that be [H]ypocrite?
MemberSince said:
FrozenFood said:well i have to say, that i am really behind bannit on this one as well as the phantom shens.
as a UK'member i am really getting sick of the "sue culture" in the US (and which seems to be spreading to the UK) anytime express an opinion.
defend youself hocp!
As much as I love america, its always been this way and always will.FrozenFood said:well i have to say, that i am really behind bannit on this one as well as the phantom shens.
as a UK'member i am really getting sick of the "sue culture" in the US (and which seems to be spreading to the UK) anytime express an opinion.
defend youself hocp!
MemberSince said:
chrisf6969 said:Off topic: but I hate that crap too.
I wish more people knew the difference between some simple words like: too, to, two; you're, your; there, they're, their; knew, new, etc.
Or in this case, the difference between slander=spoken, libel=print
remember the "s" in slander, like the "s" in spoken.
kamikazichaser said:Why would he? This shit is priceless, and can't do him any harm They gonna sue him for calling them a doggy?
Casual Lurker said:No, but it means Kyle's trying to provoke him. It shows he's more interested in drawing out the conflict than he is in "advising" futuremark to back down.
Captboom said:Why the heck are you censoring my posts.
Just because you don't like them??
I thought this was supposed to an open forum for people??
You talk about freedom of speach and the constitution and yet you play the whole censorship game. Your a Hypocrite!!!!
inotocracy said:Futuremark is gonna get...
I don't see it they way that you do, although I myself woudn't have said anything like this or have chooses something diffeent I think I know what was trying to be done.Casual Lurker said:No, but it means Kyle's trying to provoke him. It shows he's more interested in drawing out the conflict than he is in "advising" futuremark to back down.
Grinder66 said:Now he's showing them how fuckin stupid this whole thing is, by poking fun at it.
When did everyone lose their sense of humor??? I'm glad I wasn't in line for that one.
fugu said:oops, hit the wrong button...
Grinder66 said:Now he's showing them how fuckin stupid this whole thing is, by poking fun at it.
When did everyone lose their sense of humor??? I'm glad I wasn't in line for that one.
bigstusexy said:I don't see it they way that you do, although I myself woudn't have said anything like this or have chooses something diffeent I think I know what was trying to be done.
When you are challenged or threatened the first thing you don't do is give in.
Example:
A person in your neighborhood comes to you and says: "You hit my car, I'm going to sue!"
If you are innocent you do reply: "Gosh I'm sorry, just give me a chance to pay for reparis"
You'ed probably say something like: "Did you see me hit your car? What proof do you have?"
In that same way I tink he was basically responding as if to say: If you think you can sue us into silence, into making false statments or not makeing correct ones, then you have assumed incorrectly.