Worth upgrading from a 4770k at this point?

Ihaveworms

Ukfay Ancerkay
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
4,337
This weekend is tax free weekend in my state. Given that, I was looking at possibly upgrading my computer.

Current specs are:
i7-4770k @ 4.2ghz
32gb RAM
1070 GTX


I play on a 1440p 144hz monitor. The game I play most now is Escape from Tarkov and want to play Cyberpunk when that comes out. At this point, the 3700x is over a year old. Is it worth spending several hundred dollars in CPU, RAM, and motherboard to upgrade from the 4770k?
 

E4g1e

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
May 21, 2002
Messages
7,140
That setup just meets the minimum recommended hardware requirements for Cyberpunk. The Haswell (4th Generation) and Broadwell (5th Generation) CPUs are already in their "legacy" support phase, which means that there will be no more bug fixes ever for these CPUs while critical security fixes may not last much longer. And as time progresses, newer software may not run properly or at all on such a 7-year-old CPU platform.

Under these circumstances, a CPU platform upgrade is worthwhile, especially if you can get it for a fair price.
 

GotNoRice

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Jul 11, 2001
Messages
9,640
Haswell CPUs still offer good per-core performance. You will held back a bit in any game that can make good use of more than 4 cores, but at least your CPU has hyperthreading. I upgraded from an overclocked Intel 5820K (6-core Haswell-E) to a 3900X this last Christmas and in most games the performance was basically the same.

And as time progresses, newer software may not run properly or at all on such a 7-year-old CPU platform.
That seems pessimistic to me. I can't think of anything that wouldn't run on a 9.5 year old Sandy Bridge CPU, and even a 13 year old Core2Quad system would still be capable of running just about anything (although slowly in some cases). In what situation would someone have issues running software on a CPU that is only 7 years old?
 

thesmokingman

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
5,953
This weekend is tax free weekend in my state. Given that, I was looking at possibly upgrading my computer.

Current specs are:
i7-4770k @ 4.2ghz
32gb RAM
1070 GTX


I play on a 1440p 144hz monitor. The game I play most now is Escape from Tarkov and want to play Cyberpunk when that comes out. At this point, the 3700x is over a year old. Is it worth spending several hundred dollars in CPU, RAM, and motherboard to upgrade from the 4770k?
Get a 3600/3700 non-x, x, or xt, add a mb. You most likely can reuse your ram. The current Ryzens benefit from process maturation so the bins are excellent. Is it worth it... that's always up to the users pov. Old SB chips are pretty darn slow for one thing. You could wait for Ryzen 3, but you will be paying full price then. And a setup now might not be as cheap when Ryzen 3 releases, but then again you will have had the fun/benefit of being on a new Ryzen 2 setup for the 5 months up to the new release.
 

Furious_Styles

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
1,830
Get a 3600/3700 non-x, x, or xt, add a mb. You most likely can reuse your ram. The current Ryzens benefit from process maturation so the bins are excellent. Is it worth it... that's always up to the users pov. Old SB chips are pretty darn slow for one thing. You could wait for Ryzen 3, but you will be paying full price then. And a setup now might not be as cheap when Ryzen 3 releases, but then again you will have had the fun/benefit of being on a new Ryzen 2 setup for the 5 months up to the new release.
I think he has to get new ram, he probably has DDR3. OP you would benefit from a CPU upgrade but that 1070 will struggle in Cyberpunk.
 

Ihaveworms

Ukfay Ancerkay
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
4,337
I think he has to get new ram, he probably has DDR3. OP you would benefit from a CPU upgrade but that 1070 will struggle in Cyberpunk.
Yeah I would need to get new RAM. I'm still on DDR3. It is sad that a 1070 is going to struggle in cyberpunk when it is only 1 generation old. If that's the case, I feel like there isn't a big point in me upgrading now if I need to wait for nividia 3xxx series. By then new AMD cpus would probably be around the corner.
 

Furious_Styles

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
1,830
I would wait for 4000 chips to hit and ppl start dumping current hardware. No point in upgrading till you know what you need to run the game at the level you desire.
I think this is the best advice. Really the 1070 is okay for 1440p/144hz but ideally you would want a 1080 ti or greater card.
 

atarione

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
1,994
this is relevant to my interests... I have a i7 4770k (@4.4Ghz) /16GB DDR3 and a RX580.... it is old af (video card is newer due to old card eating crap)... I've been debating a upgrade for the last couple years now....

However mostly I'm just doing work on the pc nothing too demanding for various reasons gaming hasn't really been happening much for months now...

It is my birthday in 2x weeks and one option for birthday gift ... is a pc upgrade, but I'm not sure that it doesn't make more sense to wait till oct~ (or whatever) for 4600 / 4700 upgrade options with the new desktop ryzen non apu chips?
 

Sindalis

n00b
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
42
this is relevant to my interests... I have a i7 4770k (@4.4Ghz) /16GB DDR3 and a RX580.... it is old af (video card is newer due to old card eating crap)... I've been debating a upgrade for the last couple years now....

However mostly I'm just doing work on the pc nothing too demanding for various reasons gaming hasn't really been happening much for months now...

It is my birthday in 2x weeks and one option for birthday gift ... is a pc upgrade, but I'm not sure that it doesn't make more sense to wait till oct~ (or whatever) for 4600 / 4700 upgrade options with the new desktop ryzen non apu chips?
I just upgraded from a 4770K setup. (OC 4.4ghz and 16GB DDR3) to a 3700X system (details in my sig)

YES it is worth the upgrade. I have seen benefits across the board in every game I have played.

In theory the Ryzen 3 Chips will be faster, but the question really is... are you running into problems? I was running into stuttering in some things I was doing so I pulled the trigger for a new CPU/RAM/Mobo/SSD.

I was forced to upgrade after that from my GTX 1080 to a RX 5700 XT (1080 died), but I've been impressed with the 5700XT as well.
 

Nside

Limp Gawd
Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Messages
313
We've plateaued with 4 core parts when it comes to gaming. A good 4-core/8-thread CPU might have another year or less left before you start to see ambitious games really struggle on them.

I look at consoles as the inspiration for hardware optimization. Xbone and PS4 use 8-cores/8-threads, but they're really terrible 8-cores by today's standards using Jaguar architecture running at less than half the clock speed (1.6-1.7GHz) of any respectable desktop CPU. That's what current games were developed to run on.

This upcoming generation of consoles (3 to 4 months away now) Have 8-cores/8or16-threads of Zen-2 running at 3.2+GHz. Better IPC, more than double the clock speed, more threads. This will be the new MINIMUM they develop games for. Yes, 1 or 2 cores will be locked out for the OS and services (same as xbone/ps4), but that's still a hefty 6 cores and 12 threads they have FULL control over. And this is dedicated HW, we all know how they can optimize for lower spec consoles, and we need considerably faster PC hardware just to match console performance.

IMHO, I think people with 6-core CPUs are going to be struggling in 2 to 3 years, and 4-core owners are going to be on borrowed time very soon. Desktop Jaguar APUs were not good on the day they launched, and you see the performance they are able to squeeze out of those crappy chips, and what you need on desktop just to get similar performance. The console Zen2 APUs are almost identical to their desktop counterparts, you know... the Zen2 that many argue has dethroned Intel?

If I were looking to future-proof for the next 3 or 4 years when it comes to AAA games, I wouldn't use anything less than a 3700X or 9900K/10700K.
EDIT: And that would be just for playing games. If you're looking to do anything other than play games like streaming or recording in 3 or 4 years with a current CPU, 3900X or 10900K.
 
Last edited:

Tactlesss

n00b
Joined
Sep 2, 2017
Messages
53
We've plateaued with 4 core parts when it comes to gaming. A good 4-core/8-thread CPU might have another year or less left before you start to see ambitious games really struggle on them.

I look at consoles as the inspiration for hardware optimization. Xbone and PS4 use 8-cores/8-threads, but they're really terrible 8-cores by today's standards using Jaguar architecture running at less than half the clock speed (1.6-1.7GHz) of any respectable desktop CPU. That's what current games were developed to run on.

This upcoming generation of consoles (3 to 4 months away now) Have 8-cores/8or16-threads of Zen-2 running at 3.2+GHz. Better IPC, more than double the clock speed, more threads. This will be the new MINIMUM they develop games for. Yes, 1 or 2 cores will be locked out for the OS and services (same as xbone/ps4), but that's still a hefty 6 cores and 12 threads they have FULL control over. And this is dedicated HW, we all know how they can optimize for lower spec consoles, and we need considerably faster PC hardware just to match console performance.

IMHO, I think people with 6-core CPUs are going to be struggling in 2 to 3 years, and 4-core owners are going to be on borrowed time very soon. Desktop Jaguar APUs were not good on the day they launched, and you see the performance they are able to squeeze out of those crappy chips, and what you need on desktop just to get similar performance. The console Zen2 APUs are almost identical to their desktop counterparts, you know... the Zen2 that many argue has dethroned Intel?

If I were looking to future-proof for the next 3 or 4 years when it comes to AAA games, I wouldn't use anything less than a 3700X or 9900K/10700K.
EDIT: And that would be just for playing games. If you're looking to do anything other than play games like streaming or recording in 3 or 4 years with a current CPU, 3900X or 10900K.
Yeah I followed that logic pretty much to a T, coming from a 7700k. I tell you it was almost like going from a q6600 to an i7 920 and almost hitting 20 fps in crysis at 1680x1050 for the first time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nside
like this

AVATARAT

n00b
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
52
We've plateaued with 4 core parts when it comes to gaming. A good 4-core/8-thread CPU might have another year or less left before you start to see ambitious games really struggle on them.

I look at consoles as the inspiration for hardware optimization. Xbone and PS4 use 8-cores/8-threads, but they're really terrible 8-cores by today's standards using Jaguar architecture running at less than half the clock speed (1.6-1.7GHz) of any respectable desktop CPU. That's what current games were developed to run on.

This upcoming generation of consoles (3 to 4 months away now) Have 8-cores/8or16-threads of Zen-2 running at 3.2+GHz. Better IPC, more than double the clock speed, more threads. This will be the new MINIMUM they develop games for. Yes, 1 or 2 cores will be locked out for the OS and services (same as xbone/ps4), but that's still a hefty 6 cores and 12 threads they have FULL control over. And this is dedicated HW, we all know how they can optimize for lower spec consoles, and we need considerably faster PC hardware just to match console performance.

IMHO, I think people with 6-core CPUs are going to be struggling in 2 to 3 years, and 4-core owners are going to be on borrowed time very soon. Desktop Jaguar APUs were not good on the day they launched, and you see the performance they are able to squeeze out of those crappy chips, and what you need on desktop just to get similar performance. The console Zen2 APUs are almost identical to their desktop counterparts, you know... the Zen2 that many argue has dethroned Intel?

If I were looking to future-proof for the next 3 or 4 years when it comes to AAA games, I wouldn't use anything less than a 3700X or 9900K/10700K.
EDIT: And that would be just for playing games. If you're looking to do anything other than play games like streaming or recording in 3 or 4 years with a current CPU, 3900X or 10900K.
I knew it, my clocked FX with it's 8 threads can serve me few years more ! :ROFLMAO:

This things depend so hard... and to be said that only top CPU (will) matter...
 

E4g1e

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
May 21, 2002
Messages
7,140
That seems pessimistic to me. I can't think of anything that wouldn't run on a 9.5 year old Sandy Bridge CPU, and even a 13 year old Core2Quad system would still be capable of running just about anything (although slowly in some cases). In what situation would someone have issues running software on a CPU that is only 7 years old?
I am not talking about the gaming software that's currently available. I am talking about the software that comes out after CyberPunk. Moreover, chipmakers have become increasingly dictatorial. The next popular game will be expected to not run properly, if it will even run at all, on a CPU platform that's more than three years old.
 

GotNoRice

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Jul 11, 2001
Messages
9,640
The next popular game will be expected to not run properly, if it will even run at all, on a CPU platform that's more than three years old.
Why? What requirement would a game have that would cause that sort of compatibility issue?
 

Ready4Dis

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Nov 4, 2015
Messages
1,711
Why? What requirement would a game have that would cause that sort of compatibility issue?
They won't, if that were the case people wouldn't have been able to run 2500k's for as long as they did. New features will be left out and games may start using more threads, but they aren't going to just stop working on a 3 year old CPU. He's being overly dramatic/exaggerating.
 

E4g1e

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
May 21, 2002
Messages
7,140
They won't, if that were the case people wouldn't have been able to run 2500k's for as long as they did. New features will be left out and games may start using more threads, but they aren't going to just stop working on a 3 year old CPU. He's being overly dramatic/exaggerating.
Actually, I have already experienced that in real life. I was forced to upgrade to a newer platform because the programs that I use the most will not work properly on anything that's more than three years old. And it is not the performance; it's the feature support that old CPU platforms simply lack completely. It's no wonder why I have been mini-ranting against "future-proofing" in other forums.
 

Ready4Dis

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Nov 4, 2015
Messages
1,711
Actually, I have already experienced that in real life. I was forced to upgrade to a newer platform because the programs that I use the most will not work properly on anything that's more than three years old. And it is not the performance; it's the feature support that old CPU platforms simply lack completely.
Ok, and since you failed to mention whatever proprietary software your using is, I'm going to guess it's not a game like you were talking about originally.
From your quote "The next popular game will be expected to not run properly". When have you known this to be true? Never.

Sure some small apps with specific requirements may require new features, but this is by far the exception and not the rule.
 

E4g1e

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
May 21, 2002
Messages
7,140
Ok, and since you failed to mention whatever proprietary software your using is, I'm going to guess it's not a game like you were talking about originally.
From your quote "The next popular game will be expected to not run properly". When have you known this to be true? Never.

Sure some small apps with specific requirements may require new features, but this is by far the exception and not the rule.
I did not mention the software because I didn't want to throw this thread off topic (it has absolutely nothing to do with gaming, which I don't currently do).

At any rate, the OP should check the minimum requirements first, then go up from there. There is a big difference between running that game at all and running that game well enough to use regularly.
 
Top