Windows SMP frame times....post them here.

Killer[MoB];1030784062 said:
Accurate Windows SMP frame times please. If you just want to post some of the log showing the project number and some frames from idle box time, that will be fine. Please include CPU model and current clock speed. I will update this post with new entries. Thanks!
From Dew:
E6400 (2 MB shared cache) @ 3.2GHz
P2651 (1760) @ 13:51/f = 1829 PPD ( 571 PPDpGHz)
Click to expand...


In that case, my idle numbers are:
P2651 (1760) @ 13:45/f = 1843.2 PPD ( 576 PPDpGHz)
 
Q6600 @ 3.5ghz
P2651
~8mins

fahsmpgf1.jpg
 
Sgraffite said:
It has 2gb of ddr2 533 ram. Not sure what else would be relevant besides memory but it's a Dell E1505 with a 40gb hard drive and ATI x1400 graphics card running XP Pro. I thought it would be a little faster since it's the predecessor to the core 2 duo. If mine takes 2 hours to do 5 percent, I would think your's would, using the processor speed speed ratio, take about (2/1.67)*2 hours = ~2.4 hours to complete. Does your's have enough memory?
Click to expand...

Nope :( I'm working on it, though. Only 512MB at DDR533; I'm going to buy 2 gigs forthwith. I've needed this for a while, just now I have a reason.
 
Running on a T2300 Yonah mobile Core Duo, folding project 2610 every 51 minutes.

Comes out to: 430.02 ppd, just fits in the 4 day deadline at 3.53 days to fold.
 
astyler said:
Running on a T2300 Yonah mobile Core Duo, folding project 2610 every 51 minutes.

Comes out to: 430.02 ppd, just fits in the 4 day deadline at 3.53 days to fold.
Click to expand...

that's not good. Missing the 3 day perfered deadline means someone else will be assigned this WU and in the end 2x people will have crunched the same data-- IE wasting resources.

Using the -forceasm flag? I'm guessing this rig is just doing too many other things also. The deadlines on the SMP WU's are crazy tight to prevent single core users from running the client (my theroy, not publically stated).
 
marty9876 said:
that's not good. Missing the 3 day perfered deadline means someone else will be assigned this WU and in the end 2x people will have crunched the same data-- IE wasting resources.
Click to expand...

P2610 has a 4 day deadline I think. Still cutting it close though and not even close (11 minutes slower per frame) to the other T2300 that was posted already. There may be something hogging the CPU.
 
Killer[MoB];1030791112 said:
P2610 has a 4 day deadline I think. Still cutting it close though and not even close (11 minutes slower per frame) to the other T2300 that was posted already. There may be something hogging the CPU.
Click to expand...

preferred vs. final deadlines.

preferred is missed the WU get reassigned, they always do 3 day preferred and 4 day final or 2/3 /// 1.5/2 etc. deadlines- preferred is generally 1 day more than final.

Some WU's the nutty buggers (opps typo) did .5 day preferred deadlines/1 final. LOL, .5 days... :)
 
just started on dual p3 1.4 ghz on win 2003, will post once a couple frames get done


*edit*
looks like I need 175 hours to complete but I only get 96 hours. May try it anyway and see what happens when I turn in late.

[01:53:20] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core

[01:53:20] Version 1.74 (March 10, 2007)

[01:53:20]

[01:53:20] Preparing to commence simulation

[01:53:20] - Ensuring status. Please wait.

[01:53:37] - Looking at optimizations...

[01:53:37] - Working with standard loops on this execution.

[01:53:37] - Previous termination of core was improper.

[01:53:37] - Files status OK

[01:53:40] ndard loops.

[01:53:40] - Files status OK

[01:54:18] ly optimizations on if available.

[01:54:18] Entering M.D.

[01:54:21] tial work packet

[01:54:21]

[01:54:21] Project: 2610 (Run 1, Clone 99, Gen 1)

[01:54:21]

[01:54:31] Entering M.D.

[01:54:48] lone 99, Gen 1)

[01:54:48]

[01:54:49] Entering M.D.

[01:54:55] Rejecting checkpoint

[01:54:59] Protein: Protein

[01:54:59] Writing local files

[01:55:03] Extra SSE boost OK.

[01:55:05] Writing local files

[01:55:06] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0 percent)

[03:40:06] Writing local files

[03:40:07] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1 percent)
Click to expand...
 
Same PC as before, diff protein this time, 2652.

[01:42:30] Completed 310000 out of 1000000 steps (31 percent)
[01:53:14] Writing local files
[01:53:15] Completed 320000 out of 1000000 steps (32 percent)
[02:04:12] Writing local files
[02:04:12] Completed 330000 out of 1000000 steps (33 percent)
[02:14:56] Writing local files
[02:14:56] Completed 340000 out of 1000000 steps (34 percent)
[02:25:38] Writing local files
[02:25:38] Completed 350000 out of 1000000 steps (35 percent)


I feel like a spreadsheet is gonna be needed for this real soon...
 
Imitation said:
Same PC as before, diff protein this time, 2652.

[01:42:30] Completed 310000 out of 1000000 steps (31 percent)
[01:53:14] Writing local files
[01:53:15] Completed 320000 out of 1000000 steps (32 percent)
[02:04:12] Writing local files
[02:04:12] Completed 330000 out of 1000000 steps (33 percent)
[02:14:56] Writing local files
[02:14:56] Completed 340000 out of 1000000 steps (34 percent)
[02:25:38] Writing local files
[02:25:38] Completed 350000 out of 1000000 steps (35 percent)


I feel like a spreadsheet is gonna be needed for this real soon...
Click to expand...

Working on one now. It even averages two frames for me when I enter the times like you posted them. :) Very helpful.
 
Thanks for doing such a Killer job :)cool:) on putting these times/ppds together!! Also thanks for everyone else contributing said times!!
 
2651: L2400 Core Duo 30:34 Minutes/frame

X60s 1.25gb ram

831 PPD, 1.667 ghz, 498.5 PPD/Ghz

Seems like a very good project for this CPU!
 
Oldbenwa said:
Thanks for doing such a Killer job :)cool:) on putting these times/ppds together!! Also thanks for everyone else contributing said times!!
Click to expand...

No problem. I think I just made the 40th entry.:cool:

Spreadsheet version coming sometime soon.
 
zackboll said:
just started on dual p3 1.4 ghz on win 2003, will post once a couple frames get done


*edit*
looks like I need 175 hours to complete but I only get 96 hours. May try it anyway and see what happens when I turn in late.
Click to expand...

FYI, If you turn the WU late it will say Deadline has passed and you will not get credit for the WU and you will get no points at all.
 
ICE_9 said:
Look at all the pretty blue processors....:p
Click to expand...

I'm sure it will get even more blue after the price cuts coming here in about a month. Can you say E6420 for only 183 or a E6600 for 224? I've got 2 friends that can.
 
zackboll said:
just started on dual p3 1.4 ghz on win 2003, will post once a couple frames get done


*edit*
looks like I need 175 hours to complete but I only get 96 hours. May try it anyway and see what happens when I turn in late.
Click to expand...

Your end up wasting a lot of time. Turning in a WU past final deadline ='s no points and the WU will have been reassigned.

This is the crummy part of all this. Obviously running the SMP client is doing more work faster on this box right? Yet the deadlines are so nutty due to what ever factors that this won't be a possibility.
 
Mystery WU!!!!

Code: 
[08:56:36] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[08:56:36] Version 1.74 (March 10, 2007)
[08:56:36] 
[08:56:36] Preparing to commence simulation
[08:56:36] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
[08:56:53] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[08:56:53] - Not checking prior termination.
[08:56:55] - Expanded 1145786 -> 5811661 (decompressed 507.2 percent)
[08:56:55] - Failed to delete work/wudata_08.arc
[08:56:55] Warning:  check for stray files
[08:56:55] - Starting from initial work packet
[08:56:55]  available.
[08:56:55] Entering M.D.
[08:56:55] ne 172, Gen 1)
[08:56:55] 
[08:56:56] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[08:56:56] Entering M.D.
[08:57:02] Rejecting checkpoint
[08:57:03] Protein: ProteinExtra SSE boost OK.
[08:57:03] 
[08:57:03] Extra SSE boost OK.
[08:57:03] Writing local files
[08:57:03] Completed 0 out of 1000000 steps  (0 percent)
[09:12:55] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[09:21:04] Writing local files
[09:21:04] Completed 10000 out of 1000000 steps  (1 percent)
[09:37:03] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[09:45:04] Writing local files
[09:45:04] Completed 20000 out of 1000000 steps  (2 percent)
[10:01:04] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[10:09:02] Writing local files
[10:09:02] Completed 30000 out of 1000000 steps  (3 percent)
[10:25:02] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[10:32:58] Writing local files
[10:32:58] Completed 40000 out of 1000000 steps  (4 percent)
[10:48:57] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[10:56:54] Writing local files
[10:56:54] Completed 50000 out of 1000000 steps  (5 percent)
[11:12:54] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[11:20:52] Writing local files
[11:20:52] Completed 60000 out of 1000000 steps  (6 percent)
[11:36:51] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[11:44:50] Writing local files
[11:44:50] Completed 70000 out of 1000000 steps  (7 percent)
[12:00:50] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[12:08:48] Writing local files
[12:08:48] Completed 80000 out of 1000000 steps  (8 percent)
 
So....what's the verdict? Is it worth it to toss the SMP client on a C2D...or should I keep running two threads of the old stuff?
 
ND40oz said:
Just an update, overnight when I actually let my box sit idle, I was at 7:33 a frame with the 5160s and project 2610, almost done, can't wait to get the points from this guy.

Zim, what else are your 5355s running, anything else chewing up CPU time for them?
Click to expand...


just 2 instances of linux SMP
2 3036's 8.25/

Windows
2610 9.20
2651 11.46
 
marty9876 said:
Mystery WU!!!!

Code: 
[08:56:55] - Expanded 1145786 -> 5811661 (decompressed 507.2 percent)
[08:56:55] - Failed to delete work/wudata_08.arc
[08:56:55] Warning:  check for stray files
[08:56:55] - Starting from initial work packet
[08:56:55]  available.
[08:56:55] Entering M.D.
[08:56:55] ne 172, Gen 1)
[08:56:55] 
[08:56:56] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[08:56:56] Entering M.D.
[08:57:02] Rejecting checkpoint
[08:57:03] Protein: ProteinExtra SSE boost OK.
Click to expand...

Why did the multithreaded chicken cross the road?
To other get to the side.
 
From a Dell Precision 690 with 2x Xeon 5050 Dempsey core, at 3.0Ghz 2MB cache
(4x3.0 total) with 2 gig of ram.

Protein is a Project: 2651 (Run 0, Clone 258, Gen 0)

[06:48:39] Completed 150000 out of 500000 steps (30 percent)
[07:07:14] Writing local files
[07:07:14] Completed 155000 out of 500000 steps (31 percent)
[07:25:49] Writing local files
[07:25:49] Completed 160000 out of 500000 steps (32 percent)
[07:44:25] Writing local files
[07:44:25] Completed 165000 out of 500000 steps (33 percent)
[08:03:02] Writing local files
[08:03:03] Completed 170000 out of 500000 steps (34 percent)
[08:21:41] Writing local files
[08:21:41] Completed 175000 out of 500000 steps (35 percent)
[08:40:19] Writing local files
[08:40:20] Completed 180000 out of 500000 steps (36 percent)
[08:58:58] Writing local files
[08:58:59] Completed 185000 out of 500000 steps (37 percent)
[09:17:37] Writing local files
[09:17:37] Completed 190000 out of 500000 steps (38 percent)
[09:36:16] Writing local files
[09:36:16] Completed 195000 out of 500000 steps (39 percent)
[09:54:53] Writing local files
[09:54:54] Completed 200000 out of 500000 steps (40 percent)



 
wraieghaeien said:
From a Dell Precision 690 with 2x Xeon 5050 Dempsey core, at 3.0Ghz 2MB cache
(4x3.0 total) with 2 gig of ram.

Protein is a Project: 2651 (Run 0, Clone 258, Gen 0)

[06:48:39] Completed 150000 out of 500000 steps (30 percent)
[07:07:14] Writing local files
[07:07:14] Completed 155000 out of 500000 steps (31 percent)
[07:25:49] Writing local files
[07:25:49] Completed 160000 out of 500000 steps (32 percent)
[07:44:25] Writing local files
[07:44:25] Completed 165000 out of 500000 steps (33 percent)
[08:03:02] Writing local files
[08:03:03] Completed 170000 out of 500000 steps (34 percent)
[08:21:41] Writing local files
[08:21:41] Completed 175000 out of 500000 steps (35 percent)
[08:40:19] Writing local files
[08:40:20] Completed 180000 out of 500000 steps (36 percent)
[08:58:58] Writing local files
[08:58:59] Completed 185000 out of 500000 steps (37 percent)
[09:17:37] Writing local files
[09:17:37] Completed 190000 out of 500000 steps (38 percent)
[09:36:16] Writing local files
[09:36:16] Completed 195000 out of 500000 steps (39 percent)
[09:54:53] Writing local files
[09:54:54] Completed 200000 out of 500000 steps (40 percent)



Click to expand...

try vmware if on windows or if you can go linux
 
I did try VMware

timeframes on the 1760 WU's were pushing 2 hours.
apparently it is a known issue with the P-D style chips, which this xeon is apparently,
and the SMP client.

Linux is not an option its a machine at work.




 
[08:14:48] Project: 2651 (Run 0, Clone 126, Gen 1)

[11:59:22] Completed 55000 out of 500000 steps (11 percent)
[12:19:29] Writing local files
[12:19:29] Completed 60000 out of 500000 steps (12 percent)
[12:39:36] Writing local files
[12:39:36] Completed 65000 out of 500000 steps (13 percent)
[12:59:43] Writing local files
[12:59:44] Completed 70000 out of 500000 steps (14 percent)
[13:19:52] Writing local files
[13:19:52] Completed 75000 out of 500000 steps (15 percent)
[13:40:01] Writing local files
[13:40:01] Completed 80000 out of 500000 steps (16 percent)
[14:00:11] Writing local files
[14:00:11] Completed 85000 out of 500000 steps (17 percent)
[14:20:20] Writing local files
[14:20:20] Completed 90000 out of 500000 steps (18 percent)
[14:40:28] Writing local files
[14:40:28] Completed 95000 out of 500000 steps (19 percent)

Opty 165 @ 2.8Ghz // 2GB Ram // XP :D
 
Pentium-D 920 (Presler) 2.80GHz CPU w/ 2MB L2 Cache (800MHz FSB, if you care)
2GB RAM (only allowed it to use 1GB, though)

From below: looks like about 33 minutes per update. Between 0 and 1 percent complete I was compiling some code so the time might be different (didn't check, between meetings right now). Feel free to conclude anything you can infer from the data provided.

Code: 
[12:56:04] Trying to unzip core FahCore_a1.exe
[12:56:04] Decompressed FahCore_a1.exe (2035712 bytes) successfully
[12:56:04] + Core successfully engaged
[12:56:09]
[12:56:09] + Processing work unit
[12:56:09] Core required: FahCore_a1.exe
[12:56:09] Core found.
[12:56:09] Working on Unit 01 [March 20 12:56:09]
[12:56:09] + Working ...
[12:56:09] - Calling 'mpiexec -channel auto -np 4 FahCore_a1.exe -dir work/ -suf
fix 01 -checkpoint 15 -forceasm -verbose -lifeline 1080 -version 591'
[12:56:10]
[12:56:10] *------------------------------*
[12:56:10] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[12:56:10] Version 1.74 (March 10, 2007)
[12:56:10]
[12:56:10] Preparing to commence simulation
[12:56:10] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[12:56:10] - Not checking prior termination.
[12:56:14] - Expanded 2448447 -> 12854153 (decompressed 524.9 percent)
[12:56:14] - Starting from initial work packet
[12:56:14]
[12:56:14] Project: 2651 (Run 0, Clone 112, Gen 1)
[12:56:14]
[12:56:15] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[12:56:15] Entering M.D.
[12:56:31]  on if available.
[12:56:31] Entering M.D.
[12:56:38] Rejecting checkpoint
[12:56:40] Protein: Protein in POPC
[12:56:40] Writing local files
[12:56:43] Extra SSE boost OK.
[12:56:43] Writing local files
[12:56:43] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0 percent)
[13:11:44] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[13:26:45] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[13:31:18] Writing local files
[13:31:19] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1 percent)
[13:46:19] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[14:01:20] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[14:04:50] Writing local files
[14:04:50] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps  (2 percent)
[14:19:51] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[14:34:51] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[14:37:35] Writing local files
[14:37:35] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps  (3 percent)
[14:52:35] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[15:07:36] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[15:10:18] Writing local files
[15:10:19] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps  (4 percent)
[15:25:20] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[15:40:20] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[15:42:45] Writing local files
[15:42:45] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps  (5 percent)
[15:57:46] Timered checkpoint triggered.
....hope this helps!

202276
 
So from personal experience I'd say the Windows SMP client is better PPD than two single threads, but not as good PPD as running Linux64 SMP in VMWare. Anyone else agree/disagree?
 
My last results are not valid, so here are good ones, from idle times and a stable clock

P805D 2.66ghz Project 2652 - Time Per Frame - 26 Minutes 49 Seconds
 
Shlomo said:
My last results are not valid, so here are good ones, from idle times and a stable clock

P805D 2.66ghz Project 2652 - Time Per Frame - 26 Minutes 49 Seconds
Click to expand...

Thanks, I got it updated. That looks more in line now. Was way low before.
 
astyler said:
So from personal experience I'd say the Windows SMP client is better PPD than two single threads, but not as good PPD as running Linux64 SMP in VMWare. Anyone else agree/disagree?
Click to expand...

Agree. I would actually say, much better than two single clients based on the WUs that are currently running on them. The linux/vm or linux straight up makes the most points without a doubt, but if you have a windows box and vm is too much of a pain, it's a borg or the CPU just won't run virtulization then the WinSMP is a huge benefit.

Frankly, I'm just enjoying all the options we have now for running folding@home. Huge leaps forward if you ask me. It allows you to max out your production with the [H]ardware you have.
 
wraieghaeien said:
I did try VMware

timeframes on the 1760 WU's were pushing 2 hours.
apparently it is a known issue with the P-D style chips, which this xeon is apparently,
and the SMP client.

Linux is not an option its a machine at work.
Click to expand...

Make sure you have VT turned on in the bios of the 690, that could cause the slow down.
 
VT is/was turned on, and mage actually helped me troubleshoot a bunch on it.

Apparently it a known issue that certain intel p-d & xeon chips blow chunks on the SMP client. THere is/was even a rather lengthy thread on the official forums about it.

 
Ok, running on:

E6700 @ 3.5Ghz (50-52c at full load on water thank you very much ;) )

[19:28:01] Project: 2610 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0)
[19:28:01]
[19:28:02] Entering M.D.
[19:28:08] Calling FAH init
[19:28:09] Writing local files
[19:28:09] ing from checkpoint)
[19:28:09] Read checkpoint
[19:28:09] Protein: Protein
[19:28:09] Writing local files
[19:28:10] Extra SSE boost OK.
[19:28:10] Writing local files
[19:28:10] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0 percent)
[19:39:59] Writing local files
[19:39:59] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1 percent)
[19:51:33] Writing local files
[19:51:33] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2 percent)
[20:03:42] Writing local files
[20:03:42] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3 percent)
Click to expand...
 
T7600 Merom (4 MB shared cache) @ 2.33

9:27:13] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 326, Gen 0)
[19:27:13]
[19:27:15] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[19:27:15] Entering M.D.
[19:27:23] Protein: Protein
[19:27:23] Writing local files
[19:27:25] 0 out of 500000 steps (0 percent)
[19:42:26] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[19:46:34] Writing local files
[19:46:35] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1 percent)
[20:01:35] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[20:05:45] Writing local files
[20:05:45] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2 percent)
[20:20:46] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[20:25:04] Writing local files
[20:25:04] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3 percent)
[20:40:05] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[20:44:33] Writing local files
[20:44:33] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps (4 percent)
[20:59:33] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[21:04:15] Writing local files
[21:04:16] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps (5 percent)
[21:19:16] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[21:23:50] Writing local files
[21:23:50] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps (6 percent)
[21:38:51] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[21:43:55] Writing local files
[21:43:55] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps (7 percent)
 
Opty 175 @ stock(2.2ghz)

Code: 
[19:19:21] Project: 2610 (Run 1, Clone 322, Gen 0)
[19:19:21] 
[19:19:22] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[19:19:22] Entering M.D.
[19:19:43] ial work packet
[19:19:43] 
[19:19:43] Project: 2610 (Run 1, Clone 322, Gen 0)
[19:19:43] 
[19:19:48] 610 (Run 1, Clone 322, Gen 0)
[19:19:48] 
[19:19:49] Entering M.D.
[19:19:55] Rejecting checkpoint
[19:19:56] Protein: Protein
[19:19:56] Writing local files
[19:19:58] Extra SSE boost OK.
[19:19:59] Writing local files
[19:19:59] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0 percent)
[19:52:21] Writing local files
[19:52:21] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1 percent)
[20:24:50] Writing local files
[20:24:50] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps  (2 percent)
[20:58:51] Writing local files
[20:58:51] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps  (3 percent)
[21:30:41] Writing local files
[21:30:41] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps  (4 percent)
[22:03:54] Writing local files
[22:03:55] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps  (5 percent)
[22:36:36] Writing local files
[22:36:37] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps  (6 percent)
[23:10:25] Writing local files
[23:10:26] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps  (7 percent)
[23:44:47] Writing local files
[23:44:47] Completed 40000 out of 500000 steps  (8 percent)
[00:18:57] Writing local files
[00:18:58] Completed 45000 out of 500000 steps  (9 percent)
[00:52:16] Writing local files
[00:52:17] Completed 50000 out of 500000 steps  (10 percent)

 
e6400 at stock speeds (2.13 GHz)

Protein:
[09:53:06] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 37, Gen 0)

Times:
Code: 
[19:35:51] Completed 100000 out of 500000 steps  (20 percent)
[20:04:29] Writing local files
[20:04:29] Completed 105000 out of 500000 steps  (21 percent)
[20:32:46] Writing local files
[20:32:47] Completed 110000 out of 500000 steps  (22 percent)
[21:01:32] Writing local files
[21:01:33] Completed 115000 out of 500000 steps  (23 percent)
[21:33:25] Writing local files
[21:33:26] Completed 120000 out of 500000 steps  (24 percent)
[22:07:30] Writing local files
[22:07:30] Completed 125000 out of 500000 steps  (25 percent)
[22:39:10] Writing local files
[22:39:11] Completed 130000 out of 500000 steps  (26 percent)
[23:08:28] Writing local files
[23:08:29] Completed 135000 out of 500000 steps  (27 percent)
[23:43:11] Writing local files
[23:43:12] Completed 140000 out of 500000 steps  (28 percent)
[00:18:50] Writing local files
[00:18:50] Completed 145000 out of 500000 steps  (29 percent)
[00:55:41] Writing local files
[00:55:41] Completed 150000 out of 500000 steps  (30 percent)
[01:27:47] Writing local files
[01:27:48] Completed 155000 out of 500000 steps  (31 percent)
[01:56:03] Writing local files
[01:56:03] Completed 160000 out of 500000 steps  (32 percent)
[02:24:18] Writing local files
[02:24:19] Completed 165000 out of 500000 steps  (33 percent)
[02:52:44] Writing local files
[02:52:44] Completed 170000 out of 500000 steps  (34 percent)
[03:21:14] Writing local files
[03:21:14] Completed 175000 out of 500000 steps  (35 percent)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top